This is irrational fear - Page 3

phazmatis · 06-10-2008, 04:14 AM

I've installed both XP and Vista on both a low-end laptop (1gb ram), and a high-end desktop. In both cases, XP was faster. So my question is: What does Vista have that justifies the performance hit?

XJ. · 06-10-2008, 09:19 AM

For me, Vista was more stable. It worked better with our corporate wireless network. It was very easy to find programs (just start typing in search). It looked much better than XP (which is starting to look 'old'). And a bunch of other little things that made it nice to use. Yeah, Aero was a bit slow (we had some really low end graphics card in them) and disk access seemed like it should have been faster - but I had a fast machine so I had no major complaints.

I would not have said all of this a year ago.

S.SubZero · 07-17-2008, 11:22 AM

A quick update, since I find this kind of funny.

So after the initial irrational fear, some people started poking at the Vista boxes with sticks, and getting the courage to actually try using them. The Vista machines are now pretty much in use constantly. The workstation I "claimed" as my own (in my mind only) is rarely available when I get to work as several people now use it. My profile used to be the only one on the box, now most of the department is on it.

Some of the most vocal anti-Vista people at work a month ago are now the ones with the most elaborate Vista desktops.

RoadStar · 07-17-2008, 04:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by S.SubZero

A quick update, since I find this kind of funny.

So after the initial irrational fear, some people started poking at the Vista boxes with sticks, and getting the courage to actually try using them. The Vista machines are now pretty much in use constantly. The workstation I "claimed" as my own (in my mind only) is rarely available when I get to work as several people now use it. My profile used to be the only one on the box, now most of the department is on it.

Some of the most vocal anti-Vista people at work a month ago are now the ones with the most elaborate Vista desktops.

Heh........How about that................
After playing around on my wife's laptop, it's not really all that bad once you shut some of the services off................................

traveler · 07-17-2008, 10:49 PM

All that time spent (and money) learning how to ultimately what? send email? type letters? do research on the net? set up a desktop just like the "other one"?

Of course today with freedom of choice, there no longer is any from that conieving monopoly.

chuckbam · 08-04-2008, 02:49 PM

I am a BIG fan of VISTA. But, I would not be changing over a business systems.

traveler · 08-05-2008, 12:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chuckbam

I am a BIG fan of VISTA. But, I would not be changing over a business systems.

It does seem that the benefits of vista only benefit the enthusiest community.

Not cost effective for business systems. Only the payroll checks of the execs at M$ benefit there.

06-10-2008, 04:14 AM	#31
phazmatis Registered User Join Date: Jun 2008 Posts: 6	Re: This is irrational fear I've installed both XP and Vista on both a low-end laptop (1gb ram), and a high-end desktop. In both cases, XP was faster. So my question is: What does Vista have that justifies the performance hit?
(Offline)

06-10-2008, 09:19 AM	#32
XJ. ... Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: NH, USA Posts: 5,999	Re: This is irrational fear For me, Vista was more stable. It worked better with our corporate wireless network. It was very easy to find programs (just start typing in search). It looked much better than XP (which is starting to look 'old'). And a bunch of other little things that made it nice to use. Yeah, Aero was a bit slow (we had some really low end graphics card in them) and disk access seemed like it should have been faster - but I had a fast machine so I had no major complaints. I would not have said all of this a year ago.
(Offline)

07-17-2008, 11:22 AM	#33
S.SubZero Vista x64 User Join Date: Mar 2001 Location: California Posts: 1,261	Re: This is irrational fear A quick update, since I find this kind of funny. So after the initial irrational fear, some people started poking at the Vista boxes with sticks, and getting the courage to actually try using them. The Vista machines are now pretty much in use constantly. The workstation I "claimed" as my own (in my mind only) is rarely available when I get to work as several people now use it. My profile used to be the only one on the box, now most of the department is on it. Some of the most vocal anti-Vista people at work a month ago are now the ones with the most elaborate Vista desktops. __________________ -SSZ
(Offline)

07-17-2008, 10:49 PM	#35
traveler Where to next? Join Date: May 2001 Location: South Florida Posts: 18,016	All that time spent (and money) learning how to ultimately what? send email? type letters? do research on the net? set up a desktop just like the "other one"? Of course today with freedom of choice, there no longer is any from that conieving monopoly.
(Offline)

08-04-2008, 02:49 PM	#36
chuckbam Personal Advocate Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Louisiana USA Posts: 2,179	Re: This is irrational fear I am a BIG fan of VISTA. But, I would not be changing over a business systems. __________________ Q6600 G0 Quad CPU at 3.28 GHz/ FSB 1640 MHz ~ Asus P5B Deluxe ~ mushkin EM2-6400, 8GB at 820 MHz, 5-6-6-18 ~ 2x MaXLine Pro 500, RAID 0, 931GB ~ HD 3850 512MB/ HD 2600 PRO 512MB ~ Dual TV Tuners: ATI 650 Pro/ 550 PCI ~ Silverstone OP650 PS ~ 3 LCD Multiple Display w/ full custom Aero ... Vista Ultimate 64-bit ... Windows Experience Index 5.9 ... C1E Enabled ~ System Runs 24/7 .... chuckbam.com
(Offline)

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode