![]() | |
|
Welcome to the ABXZone Computer Forums forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 |
| Registered User Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 266
| I ran an experiment to see what the tradeoff is between higher vcore & higher cpu temp. Running sandra cpu benchmark in a loop, and monitoring cpu temp in mbm, I slowly increased cpu temp by shuting off my cpu fan & occaisonaly turning it back on @ 7 volts. OC'ing a 1 Ghz piii, the cpu temps that crased were: FSB 1.75v 1.85v 1.95v 147 50 61 68 148 48 57 64 149 45 55 60 150 42 52 57 Motherboard temp was 28-29 in all cases. I understand the above temps don't represent a fully stable system. I'm hoping this gives me a sense of how much to raise vcore after testing for stability to give some "head room" for changes in ambient temp. |
| (Offline) | |
| | #2 |
| a.k.a. CRC Join Date: Feb 2001 Location: Mountain View, CA
Posts: 739
| Thanks for posting your data. If you get any more results please post them too. Much steeper gradients on your temp versus fsb and vcore surface than I would have guessed. Very interesting.
__________________ Go Solar |
| (Offline) | |
| | #3 |
| Registered User Join Date: Feb 2001 Location: Norway
Posts: 30
| Yes, very interesting experiment. Would be interesting to see if you were able to get consistent results when if or if you repeat the test runs under same conditions. However, I think you are conducting somewhat of a type of destructive testing to the benefit of us all. In the area of oc-experimenting it should be interesting to see how many are experiencing thermal runaway and under what conditions? --------------- CUSL2 PIII700e@1001 Sandra mem bm 418/502 Vitelec 2x128_143 at 222-5/7 temp 24/41 degr. FOP32 HSF |
| (Offline) | |
| | #4 |
| Registered User Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 266
| i've spot run a few points and do fet similar results. don't want to repeat entire experiment...willing to shave a few minths off processor life but not years also, i only ran a narrow range of fsb...the range i'm interested in |
| (Offline) | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |