![]() | |
|
Welcome to the ABXZone Computer Forums forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 |
| Grab Life By The Balls Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Michigan
Posts: 7,835
| Intel has more 45nm problems than admitting AMD has to keep its mouth shut about Intel’s 45nm transition problems as it has a lot of TBL and clock related problems of its own. While Intel managed to master the 65nm production and now moves to 45nm, AMD still struggles with its issues on the 65nm and has a rough road to 45nm transition ahead. Intel informed its channel to expect only a few 45nm desktop quad cores in Q1 2008 while the situation should get better in Q2 and beyond. The dual core 45nm are a bit easier to get but still it doesn’t look great as only two SKUs are really available and it is hard to buy them. Intel advised shops to simply swap their 45nm orders with 65nm dual cores until further notice and healthier volumes. Intel did ship a bit better quantity of 45nm dual and quad parts of the server side, but not too much on the desktop side. Fudzilla - Intel has more 45nm problems than admitting |
| (Offline) | |
| | |||
| |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |