![]() | |
|
Welcome to the ABXZone Computer Forums forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 |
| Grab Life By The Balls Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Michigan
Posts: 7,835
| Mainboards Blamed for Intel’s New Quad-Core Microprocessors' Delay. The delay of Intel Corp.’s new breed of microprocessors manufactured using 45nm process technology was not caused by an error in chips, but was necessary to ensure compatibility of new central processing units (CPUs) with already available mainboards. As reported, Intel decided to postpone the commercial launch of its microprocessors made using 45nm process technology recently due to issues with processor system bus (PSB). According to a news-report from PC Watch web-site, the issues with quad-core code-named Yorkfield processors occur on affordable mainboards that utilize 4-layer print-circuit boards (PCBs) and do not affect expensive platforms that are based on 6-layer PCBs. As a consequence, the world’s largest producer of x86 processors decided to create a new version of its chips to retain compatibility with mainstream motherboards. Nowadays the majority of Intel’s quad-core microprocessors for desktops – which consist of two dual-core dice on a single piece of substrate – utilize 1066MHz processor system bus and only two Intel Core 2 Extreme processors QX6850 and QX9650 use 1333MHz PSB. Since Intel’s “extreme” chips that retail for over $1000 a unit are installed into expensive mainboards, no problems occur. In fact, Intel Xeon processors, some of which feature 1600MHz PSB, also do not have any troubles with such high speed. But apparently current design of Intel Core 2 Quad microprocessors with 1333MHz bus made using 45nm technology results in excessive “PSB noise”, which prevents normal operation. X-bit labs - Mainboards Blamed for Intel’s New Quad-Core Microprocessors' Delay. |
| (Offline) | |
| Advertisement | [Remove Advertisement] |
| |
| | #2 |
| Eschews Obfuscation ![]() Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: Connecticut, USA
Posts: 1,903
| Re: Mainboards Blamed for Intel’s New Quad-Core Microprocessors' Delay. As a long-time electrical engineer in digital circuit design, this strikes me as a very plausible explanation, one which is more likely to be true than most of the rumors and speculation which have been circulating on the net about this issue. -- Al |
| (Offline) | |
| | #3 |
| C1eaner Join Date: Feb 2001 Location: TX, USA
Posts: 17,254
| Re: Mainboards Blamed for Intel’s New Quad-Core Microprocessors' Delay. I can wait a loooong time this time, hope they make a killer line ...again ![]()
__________________ USA "I won't be wronged, I won't be insulted, and I won't be laid a hand on. I don't do these things to other people, and I require the same from them." Duke (The Shootist)Gigabyte_AGP_LGA775, PentiumD960_dual core 3.6GHz, SapphireHD3850_AGP512MB_DDR2, WD RaptorX 150GB SATA_clearTop_16MB + Seagate 1TB SATA_32MB, CorsairDominator 2GB 8500_1066MHz, Dell 24" 2408WFP *AGP +DVIx2 +HDMI +DisplayPort +USB2x4, XPproSP3 Inspiron9400 17"uxga CentrinoC2duoT7600_2.39GHz_685MHz 4GB Micron6400@800_675_400MHz GeForceGo7900GSMobileForce_M6Enhanced_256MB 2x500GbSATA_7200rpm_16MBcache Vista hp, VistaP6002_SP2 |
| (Offline) | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |