![]() | |
|
Welcome to the ABXZone Computer Forums forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 |
| Registered User Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: Toronto, ON
Posts: 90
| Hard Drives with NCQ Are hard drives with NCQ really much better than drives without it? Was set on getting a WD SATA drive, but notice both Seagate and Maxtor have drives with NCQ. Also, I have an ASUS P4C800-E Dlx motherboard, does NCQ work with my setup? |
| (Offline) | |
| | |||
| |
| | #2 |
| Registered User Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 13,497
| NCQ is not supported by the P4C800ED. It is possible that some future bios might be written to provide NCQ support, but I wouldn't depend on that. The drives should work, but not NCQ. |
| (Offline) | |
| | #3 |
| Registered User Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: Toronto, ON
Posts: 90
| So if NCQ is not supported by the Intel 875P chipset, what chipset supports it? The 900 Series from Intel? But more importantly - is there a real-world difference if NCQ is used. Maybe I get a pair of NCQ-ready drives today and will be able to use NCQ down the road - but I want to know if it's really useful and not just marketing hype. |
| (Offline) | |
| | #4 |
| Registered User Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 13,497
| Yep, the 9xx (and some AMD CPU supporting chipsets as well) as I understand it, but perhaps not all of the boards that use those chipsets. As to speed utilizing NCQ, there are some benchies here on that somewhere. Try a search using NCQ and you should be able to find them. You should also be able to see what MBs support it, and get a definitive answer to your question. I haven't tested them myself, so ... better to get impressions/recommendations from actual users then from me. Last edited by PCBruiser; 02-19-2005 at 10:45 AM.. |
| (Offline) | |
| | #5 |
| Moderator ![]() Join Date: Feb 2001 Location: Below sealevel
Posts: 9,664
| I have the feeling that NCQ is to harddrives that AGP x8 was to the videocards... I doubt you will see groundbreaking differences very soon until it is more widely adapted.
__________________ Main Rig: Asus P5K | Intel Core Quad Q6600 | Corsair XMS 6400-4gig ATI 3870 x2 2G | X-Fi ExtremeMusic | Z-5500D OCZ GameXstream 850W | ThermalTake Aguila | Logitech G-15 Logitech MX1000 | Synology DS-207+ NAS (2x500WD-SATA2-RAID0) |
| (Offline) | |
| | #6 |
| Got Speed? Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 576
| No noticeable benefit to NCQ I set up a rig with a Promise TX4200 Raid controller, which supports NCQ. First of all, the supplied driver does not work to enable the NCQ, and last of all, NCQ made less than 1% difference having it on or off. All in all, it may have some advantages, but I have yet to see any in the real world. I noticed more of a difference going from a Barracuda 7200.7 to a 7200.8, which went from a max read speed of ~60 on the 7200.7 to ~70 on the 7200.8, and also average read time went up almost 10mb/s (48mb/s compared to 57)
__________________ Rig #1: DFI LanParty 875P-T, Prescott 3.2F 640 N0 @ 4.35GHz 1 GB Kit OCZ EL Platinum PC4200 @2.5/3/3/8 Swiftech 6002 CPU block, BIX3 + BIX rads ATI All-In-Wonder X800XT, Catalyst 5.4 SoundBlaster Audigy 2 ZS Platinum Seagate Barracuda V 160GB SATA, Liteon 1673S, Liteon 5237 OCZ PowerStream 600W PSU WinXP Pro SP2 Rig #2: ASUS P4C800E, BIOS 1021, P4 3.0C @ 3.8GHz, cooled by ThermalTake BigWater 1GB Kit OCZ VX4000, 2.5/2/2/8, 3.6v, Turbo, PAT enabled @1:1 ATI All-In-Wonder 9800 Pro, Catalyst 5.3 WD 160GB SATA, Liteon 48161 OCZ Modstream 520W PSU WinXP Pro SP2 Any input given is a result of first-hand experience, not some **** I read on the internet |
| (Offline) | |
| | #7 |
| Avtomat Kalashnikova 1947 Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: Billings, MT
Posts: 1,324
| NCQ is not likely to be a huge benefit in a desktop environment anyway - it's geared more towards servers from my understanding.
__________________ Intel C2D E6850 8GB Corsair DDR2 800 Abit IP35 Pro BFG 8800GTXOC2 Auzentech X-Plosion WD1500ADFD Pioneer DVR-710 PCP&C Silencer 610 TT Tsunami Westinghouse LVM-37W3 Folding for Team# 35216 : Nv News + OSNN + SP |
| (Offline) | |
| | #8 | |
| Registered User Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Surrey BC
Posts: 487
| Quote:
I have heard NCQ would be useful when more multi-threaded apps come out. | |
| (Offline) | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |