ABXZone Computer  Forums



Welcome to the ABXZone Computer Forums forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-19-2005, 10:16 AM   #1
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Toronto, ON
Posts: 90
Hard Drives with NCQ

Are hard drives with NCQ really much better than drives without it? Was set on getting a WD SATA drive, but notice both Seagate and Maxtor have drives with NCQ. Also, I have an ASUS P4C800-E Dlx motherboard, does NCQ work with my setup?
(Offline)   Reply With Quote

 
Old 02-19-2005, 10:26 AM   #2
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 13,497
NCQ is not supported by the P4C800ED. It is possible that some future bios might be written to provide NCQ support, but I wouldn't depend on that. The drives should work, but not NCQ.
(Offline)   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2005, 10:31 AM   #3
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Toronto, ON
Posts: 90
So if NCQ is not supported by the Intel 875P chipset, what chipset supports it? The 900 Series from Intel? But more importantly - is there a real-world difference if NCQ is used. Maybe I get a pair of NCQ-ready drives today and will be able to use NCQ down the road - but I want to know if it's really useful and not just marketing hype.
(Offline)   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2005, 10:38 AM   #4
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 13,497
Yep, the 9xx (and some AMD CPU supporting chipsets as well) as I understand it, but perhaps not all of the boards that use those chipsets. As to speed utilizing NCQ, there are some benchies here on that somewhere. Try a search using NCQ and you should be able to find them. You should also be able to see what MBs support it, and get a definitive answer to your question. I haven't tested them myself, so ... better to get impressions/recommendations from actual users then from me.

Last edited by PCBruiser; 02-19-2005 at 10:45 AM..
(Offline)   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2005, 10:47 AM   #5
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Below sealevel
Posts: 9,664
I have the feeling that NCQ is to harddrives that AGP x8 was to the videocards... I doubt you will see groundbreaking differences very soon until it is more widely adapted.
__________________
Main Rig:
Asus P5K | Intel Core Quad Q6600 | Corsair XMS 6400-4gig
ATI 3870 x2 2G | X-Fi ExtremeMusic | Z-5500D
OCZ GameXstream 850W | ThermalTake Aguila | Logitech G-15
Logitech MX1000 | Synology DS-207+ NAS (2x500WD-SATA2-RAID0)
(Offline)   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2005, 04:22 PM   #6
Got Speed?
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 576
No noticeable benefit to NCQ

I set up a rig with a Promise TX4200 Raid controller, which supports NCQ. First of all, the supplied driver does not work to enable the NCQ, and last of all, NCQ made less than 1% difference having it on or off.
All in all, it may have some advantages, but I have yet to see any in the real world.
I noticed more of a difference going from a Barracuda 7200.7 to a 7200.8, which went from a max read speed of ~60 on the 7200.7 to ~70 on the 7200.8, and also average read time went up almost 10mb/s (48mb/s compared to 57)
__________________

Rig #1:
DFI LanParty 875P-T, Prescott 3.2F 640 N0 @ 4.35GHz
1 GB Kit OCZ EL Platinum PC4200 @2.5/3/3/8
Swiftech 6002 CPU block, BIX3 + BIX rads
ATI All-In-Wonder X800XT, Catalyst 5.4
SoundBlaster Audigy 2 ZS Platinum
Seagate Barracuda V 160GB SATA, Liteon 1673S, Liteon 5237
OCZ PowerStream 600W PSU
WinXP Pro SP2

Rig #2:
ASUS P4C800E, BIOS 1021, P4 3.0C @ 3.8GHz, cooled by ThermalTake BigWater
1GB Kit OCZ VX4000, 2.5/2/2/8, 3.6v, Turbo, PAT enabled @1:1
ATI All-In-Wonder 9800 Pro, Catalyst 5.3
WD 160GB SATA, Liteon 48161
OCZ Modstream 520W PSU
WinXP Pro SP2

Any input given is a result of first-hand experience, not some **** I read on the internet
(Offline)   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2005, 04:49 PM   #7
Avtomat Kalashnikova 1947
 
Riptide's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Billings, MT
Posts: 1,324
NCQ is not likely to be a huge benefit in a desktop environment anyway - it's geared more towards servers from my understanding.
__________________
Intel C2D E6850
8GB Corsair DDR2 800
Abit IP35 Pro
BFG 8800GTXOC2
Auzentech X-Plosion
WD1500ADFD
Pioneer DVR-710
PCP&C Silencer 610
TT Tsunami
Westinghouse LVM-37W3

Folding for Team# 35216 : Nv News + OSNN + SP
(Offline)   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2005, 01:04 AM   #8
Registered User
 
Intel_User's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Surrey BC
Posts: 487
Quote:
NCQ is not likely to be a huge benefit in a desktop environment anyway - it's geared more towards servers from my understanding.
Yep, you are right. Actually it doesn't benefit desktop at all. Its kinda like bringing ECC to PC(note: they haven't), we don't care about the extra stability as long as it runs more than 24 hours at a time.

I have heard NCQ would be useful when more multi-threaded apps come out.
(Offline)   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.1
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com

© 2006 - 2009 ABXZone Forums | About ABX Zone Forums | Advertising Opportunities | Legal | A member of the Crowdgather Forum Community