ABXZone Computer  Forums



Welcome to the ABXZone Computer Forums forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-14-2001, 03:57 AM   #1
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 65
Which will perform better? 2 sticks of 128 mb, cas2, PC133 ..... OR ...... 1 stick of 256mb, cas2, PC133 ?

Looking at Crucial Micron (-7E) if that has any bearing on the answer.

Thanks.

KJ
(Offline)   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2001, 05:06 AM   #2
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 53
Take 2x single side 128 or 1x double side 256.
Because max number of sides is limited to 4
__________________
P4T-E;
PIV 1600;
512Mb Dane-Elec RDRAM;
Hercules Prophet III Ti200;
Adaptec2940U2W;
Toshiba DVD Rom;
4x Quantum U2W scsi disks;
Soundblaster128;
Digital NIC;
Adaptec2940U;
DDS2 Tape unit;
Yamaha2100S Rewriter;
(Offline)   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2001, 06:00 AM   #3
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Metuchen, NJ
Posts: 49
Smile

I believe the 256MB stick will be slightly faster than the two 128's. I have one "-7E" stick of the 256 & 128 type and they work fine. They read CAS2 in SPD and in memory checker program CTSPD. Mine are both one-sided sticks. From what I've read, the 256 is faster since there is only 1 EEPROM on the 256 instead the two if you use two 128 sticks.

[Edited by ctsracer on 02-14-2001 at 06:03 AM]
(Offline)   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2001, 07:55 AM   #4
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Seattle WA
Posts: 271
If the specs are the same the 256 is faster than 2x128.
__________________
Eddie S.
(Offline)   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2001, 02:06 AM   #5
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 65
Thanks everybody


KJ
(Offline)   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.1
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com