ABXZone Computer  Forums



Welcome to the ABXZone Computer Forums forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-10-2001, 12:27 AM   #1
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: KC
Posts: 3

Hi,

I wanted to report that I have 2x 256MB double sided Crucial cas 2 pc133 running in my machine currently.

I pulled a 128 MB apacer and replaced it with the Crucial ram (which is headed for a new development server).

Anyway, I wanted to post that the ram is stable with 2 sticks and booted right up as if nothing had changed after the upgrade. The machine has been up for just over 7 days running win 2k pro without any problems.

-d
(Offline)   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2001, 08:51 AM   #2
Registered User
 
cryogen_abx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Halifax N.S Canada
Posts: 1,350
yea, i had the same thing when i got the right ram for my sys....
have had np rpobs whatsoever since putting the 2 sticks i got in..runs great!
cryogen
__________________
umm nope
(Offline)   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2001, 10:48 AM   #3
ABX KNIGHT EXEMPLAR
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: USA-GA
Posts: 25,972
Thanks guys for the in put! I have one stick of 256 Crucial and thinking of another.
(Offline)   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2001, 09:14 PM   #4
Another content P4 owner
 
bobsled's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: SoCal
Posts: 539
casablanc,

What are you running it at 2,2,2,x,x?
(Offline)   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2001, 12:32 AM   #5
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: KC
Posts: 3
The bios had it defaulted to 2,2,2,7,9. I just lowered it to 2,2,2,5,7. 5,7 and 7,9 were the only choices.

fsb is at 133 in both cases.

Maybe I should upgrade away from bios rev 1002, shouldn't there be a choice of 6/8?
(Offline)   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2001, 09:09 PM   #6
Another content P4 owner
 
bobsled's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: SoCal
Posts: 539
Wink

Great. If you're running at 2,2,2,5,7 you're running at peak! I was just wondering because I plan to do the same two 256s (double-sided). How about posting some benchmarks?
(Offline)   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.1
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com