ABXZone Computer  Forums



Welcome to the ABXZone Computer Forums forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-26-2001, 12:53 AM   #1
[AB]Supporter
 
[AB]|G|war's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Utah..
Posts: 1,063
Talking Mushkin Rules....... U Around?

i have a ? for yea.......also im back........you helped me alot with my old cusl2 m/b.....story is a went and tried a few other m/b to try see what is the best out there..anyways ,tried AMD.tb cpu's
THAT WAS A LOST CAUSE...tried to give AMD a chance with me,they failed badly,even tried the iwill board with a amd 1.333...nothing but problems...ic an go on but im sure your bored or so is everyone else...Ok,to my ? i now have a ASUS P4T board, with my leadtek g3 card, 256 rdram pc 800..oh 1.7 cpu..i want "MUSHKIN" rdram pc 800...what makes there memory over other venders better? i now have "samsung" is that good?
(Offline)   Reply With Quote

Advertisement [Remove Advertisement]

Old 07-31-2001, 07:51 AM   #2
Registered User
 
Mushkin Rules's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Mushkin Tropical Island
Posts: 2,563
Iwill KK266-R and Asus A7V133 is the best and most stable VIA KT133A mobo for AMD. I use TBird 1.2 GHz B chip (100/200) on KK266-R O'clocked to 1500 MHz (9.5 x 158) and TBird 750 MHz B chip (100/200) on A7V133 O'clocked to 943 MHz (6.5 x 145). They are both work like a charm on my system. Even the TBird 750 MHz O'clocked to 943 is much better improved & faster sytem in performance wise than my CUSL2 with Intel 800EB Oclocked to 960 (FSB 160). Sorry to hear that AMD is not working as you have expected. I had to be an Intel user all my live and was against any AMD & VIA products in the past. But, after I tried AMD and VIA myself, in my whole experience, they are faster than Intel. I began to give AMD & VIA a chance after reviewing a performance battlle review between Intel setup with DUAL processor & mobo (2 x 800EB) vs AMD setup with SINGLE processor (1.33GHz). Both system are using SDRAM. On all occasion of benchmark, the AMD SINGLE processor setup has far better performance & faster than Intel's DUAL processor setup. The review impress me very much on AMD and decided to give it a try.

Can you specify a bit detail on how bad did your AMD system set up go, and how bad did the system fail?

Anyways, Samsung is one of the major player who supplies RDRAM. I do not know how good RDRAM is, cause I have never build a system that uses RDRAM
__________________
Show Your Supports by Clicking This Advertisers...
(Offline)   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.1
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com