| |
 |  Components, Peripherals, Cases, Mods, & Cooling Memory Memory Discuss ram performance disappointing.... in the Components, Peripherals, Cases, Mods, & Cooling forums; my new PC3200 Gold at 2-2-2-5 timings barely performs better buffered and performs worse unbuffered than my ... |
|
Welcome to the ABXZone Computer Forums forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. |
 |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
06-06-2005, 11:58 PM
| #1 |
| Re-Retiring  Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: MN, USA
Posts: 24,834
| ram performance disappointing.... my new PC3200 Gold at 2-2-2-5 timings barely performs better buffered and performs worse unbuffered than my old Plat. Rev 2's at 2.5-4-3-7 timings at the same speeds. this is not making any sense to me. I thought tighter timings meant better performance. could my mobo be to blame?????? because i also can't boot to windows at more than 245 without using more than 3.65vdimm  Plats: 6456/6388 buffered and 3214/3305 Gold: 6517/6436 buffered and 3176/3292 unbuffered
__________________ Bye Bye ABXZone.....Rest In Peace. |
| (Offline) |  |
| Advertisement | [Remove Advertisement] |
| |
|
06-07-2005, 12:26 AM
| #2 |
| Registered User Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 13,880
| Have you run 3DMark or SuperPi? Both of those tests tend to benefit from tighter timings. Use the mooded version of SuperPi which measures times down to the millisecond. Also try some gaming to see what kind of frame rates you're getting. |
| (Offline) | |
|
06-07-2005, 01:02 AM
| #3 |
| Re-Retiring Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: MN, USA
Posts: 24,834
| just started testing tonite, and i am really tempted to order a Neo2. my superpi 1M score is identical, i didn't have my 32M score recorded at 240mhz before so i can't compare that, but i just got 29m 43s at 240 and 2-2-2-5 @3.48v running 2001se now to compare that score with my old one at 240
__________________ Bye Bye ABXZone.....Rest In Peace. |
| (Offline) | |
|
06-07-2005, 01:07 AM
| #4 |
| Re-Retiring Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: MN, USA
Posts: 24,834
| 2001se just crashed at 240x10 1.4vcore and 2-2-2-5@3.48v
__________________ Bye Bye ABXZone.....Rest In Peace. |
| (Offline) | |
|
06-07-2005, 01:15 AM
| #6 |
| Re-Retiring Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: MN, USA
Posts: 24,834
| some of those are DFI nf4 settings only right? i know i could change some of them with A64 tweaker though. Is there any possibility this could be mobo related? i can just order a neo2 if that would be better re-running 2001se with 1.425vcore, same settings as above, we will see what happens i guess.
__________________ Bye Bye ABXZone.....Rest In Peace. |
| (Offline) | |
|
06-07-2005, 01:18 AM
| #7 |
| Re-Retiring Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: MN, USA
Posts: 24,834
| well my 2001se score jumped a good amount at the same settings though!!! 25610 with gold compared to 24942 with Rev 2's, wasn't expecting that!
__________________ Bye Bye ABXZone.....Rest In Peace. |
| (Offline) | |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Linear Mode
