![]() | |
|
Welcome to the ABXZone Computer Forums forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #16 |
| Registered User Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 176
| H2o: I didn't get the sense that Warez was having a problem with Memtest crashing, but with some other software. Warez: Can you identify the software that you are running?
__________________ SuperMicro P4DC6+ Dual Pentium XEON 1.7GHz {I was thinking bandwidth, PCI-X, SCSI etc, Turned out to be louder than my electric razor. Taught me to pay attention to heat and noise. Intel D875PBZ-204 - P4/2.53GHz/512K/533Mhz Rock solid system - the type where Intel makes you a believer ASUS A8N-VM CSM AMD 3500+ Venice {Heard all the trash talk on the Net. Wanted first hand experience before challenging AMD fanboys. What I found was, my AMD 3500+ was cooler and a bit faster than my 2.53GHz P4, but the Intel system was much more dependable. Intel D975XBX-305 E6600 SL9S8 2.4GHz/4MBL2/1067FSB/default Voltage Antec P180 case/Antec Phantom 500 PSU/AC cooler 7 Pro. Crucial DDR2 667 ECC 2x512MB SPD 5-5-5-15 /74GB Raptor / 2x WD 500GB in Intel Matrix Raid / 1TB Seagate / PNY GeForce 7600 GS / Vista Ultimate SP1 installed on 128K striped drive |
| (Offline) | |
| Advertisement | [Remove Advertisement] |
| |
| | #17 |
| Registered User Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 176
| I still stand by my earlier statement that this IS NOT a failure of memory, but rather a program which passed bad parameters to an operating system module, which then tried to access a memory address that the routine did not have rights to. |
| (Offline) | |
| | #18 |
| Registered User Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 4,449
| Memtest86+ is just a really small, self-contained OS that is in a bootsector and doesn’t interact with the os on the computer, it doesn’t even need a hard drive installed and you can even run it from a bios (DFI Lanparty for example). If the error message specifically says "Check your memory", its probably a good idea to check the memory! It could be a segmentation fault, which is when the program is trying to access memory it hasn't declared itself. What program are you trying to run? If it is japanese, and you are running it on a non-japanese localized system or one which doesnt support WCHAR_T's, what might be happening is the application is programmed to use a WCHAR_T (basically a character variable that is larger than the standard CHAR type) and it is not able to correctly address and access the memory.
__________________ |
| (Offline) | |
| | #19 | ||
| Registered User Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 9
| First of all thanks for your guys helping hands. @h20-ski Quote:
@GWillakers Quote:
@John64 That's file sharing program and yea it's japanese but over non-Unicode there i have change to Japanese and also i have try with change back to default which means is English US and using Apploc to open the program with Japanese language but the result also same and i have using this program quite long time it also working fine but suddenly this problem come out,i really no idea with it and the error keep ask me "Check Your Memory!". So far i have use diffrent type of ram to test it,that's Reg ECC and Non ECC.The Reg ECC it's brand new and it working fine with my m/b but it just work as normal ram,even it's new but the program still give me the error so i try again with the other slot but still same,that's really weird even new ram also giving such problem. | ||
| (Offline) | |
| | #20 | |
| Registered User Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 176
| Quote:
Others will tell you to try a different slot... Sure you can try that to eliminate another variable... But truly this is a VERY COMMON PROGRAMMING BLUNDER.... My recommendation would be to re-installl the Japeneese program and then try again.
__________________ SuperMicro P4DC6+ Dual Pentium XEON 1.7GHz {I was thinking bandwidth, PCI-X, SCSI etc, Turned out to be louder than my electric razor. Taught me to pay attention to heat and noise. Intel D875PBZ-204 - P4/2.53GHz/512K/533Mhz Rock solid system - the type where Intel makes you a believer ASUS A8N-VM CSM AMD 3500+ Venice {Heard all the trash talk on the Net. Wanted first hand experience before challenging AMD fanboys. What I found was, my AMD 3500+ was cooler and a bit faster than my 2.53GHz P4, but the Intel system was much more dependable. Intel D975XBX-305 E6600 SL9S8 2.4GHz/4MBL2/1067FSB/default Voltage Antec P180 case/Antec Phantom 500 PSU/AC cooler 7 Pro. Crucial DDR2 667 ECC 2x512MB SPD 5-5-5-15 /74GB Raptor / 2x WD 500GB in Intel Matrix Raid / 1TB Seagate / PNY GeForce 7600 GS / Vista Ultimate SP1 installed on 128K striped drive | |
| (Offline) | |
| | #21 |
| Forget Wakeboarding Join Date: May 2004 Location: Texas
Posts: 2,460
| What I was alluding to is that for example each integrated peripheral uses up a certain amount of memory at a certain location. And it is the BIOS's job to allocate and map the memory so that the system does not use it. And in the world of coding there are some not so great programmers and so the memory that is allocated to the device does not get mapped, and a program will try to use it, but the device is already using it, therefore causing the system to crash or run crazy. What I would do is go into the BIOS and turn off all peripherals that you do not use. ie, serial ports, parallel ports, sound, nic, floppy and such. Then run memtest and see what happens.
__________________ |
| (Offline) | |
| | #22 | |
| Registered User Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 9
| @GWillakers Yea i have reinstall many times but still the same. @h20-ski I have turn off all peripherals that i didn't use but still the same. When i'm free will try use memtest or goldmemory to test it.But i have ask many user that using this program and all of them didn't have such problem with it just only me. From their readme. Quote:
Last edited by warez : 10-13-2006 at 12:49 PM. | |
| (Offline) | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |