SISOFT MEM SCORES POLL

defrag · 04-22-2001, 11:07 PM

Well, I was just wondeirng wut everyone else Memory scores were.
Im using Sisoft Sandra Pro 2000 and get a score of

442/507

This is at 157FSB 3,2,2 7/9 Strong

I also did all the memory tweaks with WPCredit and such. So im just wondering what everyone else is getting. Thanks

This is a 256meg Crucial Stick and in Win98 SE

-defrag

Sir Skully · 04-22-2001, 11:43 PM

866eb cbo @1007, 155 FSB, 222 5-7 strong, Vcore 175, all the tweaks. SiSoft 459/542, Mushkin 256 rev2.

blurb_me · 04-23-2001, 01:09 AM

462/562 @ 160FSB,2-2-2,7-9 with stuffpcr tweaks.

patentman · 04-23-2001, 05:08 PM

WinMe-stuffpcr-2xMuskin rev3
Yeah,I know.Someone will comment the higher P4 score.Too pitty Rambus isn`t such good at real world apps

Optimized operating system-157 222 7,9:

Non optimized(pitty)-160 222 7,9:

A close to yours 322 setting.
Non optimized-160 322 7,9:
456-527

[Edited by patentman on 04-23-2001 at 05:12 PM]

blurb_me · 04-24-2001, 01:11 PM

this sound stupid but i want an answer.

does faster cpu contribute to higher score in sisoft memory benchmark or does the ram make the different???

izzit better to run at 133fsb with 2x128mb (388/465) or 1x 128mb at 160fsb (462/562) ???

***Ozzie*** · 04-24-2001, 01:16 PM

The ram quality does make some difference - but the real "bang" these guys are getting is from the "eb" chips. The FSB that you run is really the difference.
I run a 700e @ 933 (133) on one of my rigs and the memory scores are way lower than these guys - then I have another rig that runs higher FSB's and the scores aren't even close.

defrag · 04-25-2001, 11:07 AM

ITs all about teh FSB, If i were you id stick with 256meg of RAM rather then a faster FSB with only 128meg. Hey Patent, what kind of memory are you using that you can do 2.2.2 at 157FSB? I want it! giVe it to me! =p

-defrag

patentman · 04-25-2001, 02:32 PM

Hey defrag,why are saying that?

speedy_abx · 04-28-2001, 08:08 PM

465/538 running 256mb generic 3 2 2 normal in bios 866@1080 disabled onboard l2 cache !!!!!!!!!!

blurb_me · 04-28-2001, 10:32 PM

hey speedy
how do u disable the L2???
as far as i know, even you disable it in the bios, the cpu is set to enable it by default.

speedy_abx · 04-29-2001, 08:58 AM

not on any of my rigs !!!!!

Layne · 05-06-2001, 09:49 PM

Don't disable l2 cache...it may allow you to overclock higher, but kills speed...p3 has 256k of l2 cache that stores instructions...if u disable it it has to pull that infor from ram which is a lot slower than the l2....run some real world games or apps or a benchmark like 3dmark2k or 2001 and see the difference.

blurb_me · 05-07-2001, 04:46 AM

hey, do you know that 1006A bios give higher memory score than beta 11.

previously was 462/562

blurb_me · 05-07-2001, 04:49 AM

schmittmj · 05-08-2001, 03:12 AM

Win98SE

471/549

157 2-2-2 7/9 Strong

I can post at 160 2-2-2 5/7....I think my CPU is the problem

[Edited by schmittmj on 05-08-2001 at 03:42 AM]

04-22-2001, 11:07 PM	#1
defrag l33t h4x0r Join Date: Feb 2001 Location: Miami, FL Posts: 100	Well, I was just wondeirng wut everyone else Memory scores were. Im using Sisoft Sandra Pro 2000 and get a score of 442/507 This is at 157FSB 3,2,2 7/9 Strong I also did all the memory tweaks with WPCredit and such. So im just wondering what everyone else is getting. Thanks This is a 256meg Crucial Stick and in Win98 SE -defrag __________________ pIII 700E@1.1ghz 157FSB 256meg Crucial PC133 3,2,2 Win2000 SP2
(Offline)

04-22-2001, 11:43 PM	#2
Sir Skully ABX KNIGHT EXEMPLAR Join Date: Feb 2001 Location: USA-GA Posts: 26,210	866eb cbo @1007, 155 FSB, 222 5-7 strong, Vcore 175, all the tweaks. SiSoft 459/542, Mushkin 256 rev2.
(Offline)

04-23-2001, 01:09 AM	#3
blurb_me Intel Boy Join Date: Feb 2001 Posts: 140	462/562 @ 160FSB,2-2-2,7-9 with stuffpcr tweaks. __________________ Iwill KK266 Athlon 850@1G 384MB Kingmax PC150 MSI GF2 MX@200/180
(Offline)

04-23-2001, 05:08 PM	#4
patentman Modded Person Join Date: Feb 2001 Location: Athens, Greece Posts: 2,281	WinMe-stuffpcr-2xMuskin rev3 Yeah,I know.Someone will comment the higher P4 score.Too pitty Rambus isn`t such good at real world apps Optimized operating system-157 222 7,9: Non optimized(pitty)-160 222 7,9: A close to yours 322 setting. Non optimized-160 322 7,9: 456-527 [Edited by patentman on 04-23-2001 at 05:12 PM]
(Offline)

04-24-2001, 01:11 PM	#5
blurb_me Intel Boy Join Date: Feb 2001 Posts: 140	this sound stupid but i want an answer. does faster cpu contribute to higher score in sisoft memory benchmark or does the ram make the different??? izzit better to run at 133fsb with 2x128mb (388/465) or 1x 128mb at 160fsb (462/562) ??? __________________ Iwill KK266 Athlon 850@1G 384MB Kingmax PC150 MSI GF2 MX@200/180
(Offline)

04-24-2001, 01:16 PM	#6
*Ozzie* neutered Join Date: Feb 2001 Location: Apple Valley, MN Posts: 10,261	The ram quality does make some difference - but the real "bang" these guys are getting is from the "eb" chips. The FSB that you run is really the difference. I run a 700e @ 933 (133) on one of my rigs and the memory scores are way lower than these guys - then I have another rig that runs higher FSB's and the scores aren't even close. __________________ Have you supported your forum today? Change is the only constant in life
(Offline)

04-25-2001, 11:07 AM	#7
defrag l33t h4x0r Join Date: Feb 2001 Location: Miami, FL Posts: 100	ITs all about teh FSB, If i were you id stick with 256meg of RAM rather then a faster FSB with only 128meg. Hey Patent, what kind of memory are you using that you can do 2.2.2 at 157FSB? I want it! giVe it to me! =p -defrag __________________ pIII 700E@1.1ghz 157FSB 256meg Crucial PC133 3,2,2 Win2000 SP2
(Offline)

04-25-2001, 02:32 PM	#8
patentman Modded Person Join Date: Feb 2001 Location: Athens, Greece Posts: 2,281	Hey defrag,why are saying that?
(Offline)

04-28-2001, 08:08 PM	#9
speedy_abx Old Timer on the Fourm Join Date: Feb 2001 Location: USA Posts: 99	465/538 running 256mb generic 3 2 2 normal in bios 866@1080 disabled onboard l2 cache !!!!!!!!!!
(Offline)

04-28-2001, 10:32 PM	#10
blurb_me Intel Boy Join Date: Feb 2001 Posts: 140	hey speedy how do u disable the L2??? as far as i know, even you disable it in the bios, the cpu is set to enable it by default. __________________ Iwill KK266 Athlon 850@1G 384MB Kingmax PC150 MSI GF2 MX@200/180
(Offline)

04-29-2001, 08:58 AM	#11
speedy_abx Old Timer on the Fourm Join Date: Feb 2001 Location: USA Posts: 99	not on any of my rigs !!!!!
(Offline)

05-06-2001, 09:49 PM	#12
Layne Registered User Join Date: May 2001 Posts: 4	Don't disable l2 cache...it may allow you to overclock higher, but kills speed...p3 has 256k of l2 cache that stores instructions...if u disable it it has to pull that infor from ram which is a lot slower than the l2....run some real world games or apps or a benchmark like 3dmark2k or 2001 and see the difference.
(Offline)

05-07-2001, 04:46 AM	#13
blurb_me Intel Boy Join Date: Feb 2001 Posts: 140	hey, do you know that 1006A bios give higher memory score than beta 11. previously was 462/562 __________________ Iwill KK266 Athlon 850@1G 384MB Kingmax PC150 MSI GF2 MX@200/180
(Offline)

05-07-2001, 04:49 AM	#14
blurb_me Intel Boy Join Date: Feb 2001 Posts: 140	why the pic doesnt work Pic1 __________________ Iwill KK266 Athlon 850@1G 384MB Kingmax PC150 MSI GF2 MX@200/180
(Offline)

05-08-2001, 03:12 AM	#15
schmittmj Hmm...A custom title? Join Date: Feb 2001 Location: WI Posts: 19	Win98SE 471/549 157 2-2-2 7/9 Strong I can post at 160 2-2-2 5/7....I think my CPU is the problem [Edited by schmittmj on 05-08-2001 at 03:42 AM] __________________ Pics of my case mod coming soon......stay tuned.
(Offline)

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode