![]() | |
|
Welcome to the ABXZone Computer Forums forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 |
| Elite Members Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: S.W. Kansas
Posts: 2,841
| Auslogics Reg Defrag License:Free Requirements: Windows NT/2000/XP/2003 Server/Vista Date Added:June 19, 2007 Publisher's description of Auslogics Registry Defrag Publisher's description of Auslogics Registry Defrag 1of 3 From AusLogics: Microsoft Windows and various programs access the registry a few hundred times a second. Therefore a fragmented registry is one of the major reasons why your computer may be so slow. Auslogics Registry Defrag can significantly speed up your computer by helping you defragment registry, remove gaps and make it contiguous, smaller and faster to access. Version 4.0.4 improved user's interface, added Windows Vista support, and application start and exit speed improved up to 200%. -------------------- http://dw.com.com/redir?edId=3&siteI...-10694974.html -------------------- I have tested this and I have had no problems ---------------------------------------------Results for scan Registry hives processes: 10 Registry analysis started: 04:02:33 pm Registry analysis finished: 04:03:26 pm Registry analysis total time: 0 minutes 53 seconds Registry size before: 60,416 Kb Registry size after: 53,404 Kb Registry size improvement: 12% Perfomance improvement: 17%
__________________ [COLOR="DarkRed"]The only Stupid Question is the one you failed to Ask![/color] [COLOR="Blue"]Beta Tester since Pre Win 95.[/COLOR] |
| (Offline) | |
| | |||
| |
| | #2 |
| Super Moderator Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Salisbury, UK
Posts: 2,355
| Good stuff I have tried to use registry booster, but on a clean Vista install it found over 80000 problems so I don;t quite think it;s working crabby |
| (Offline) | |
| | #3 |
| Super Moderator Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Salisbury, UK
Posts: 2,355
| NB: I found the issue and apparantly it is quite universal for registry cleaners. Bascially the cleaner will loop around wow6432node. Here is a link to a fix: http://forums.microsoft.com/TechNet/...7521&SiteID=17 Simple fix, works perfectly! crabby |
| (Offline) | |
| | #4 |
| Elite Members Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: S.W. Kansas
Posts: 2,841
| Never had that problem but them I'm running the 32Bit version.. I think on a Clean install with the two REG Cleaners that I use all the time there is about 3400 errors. I use REGCURE, Reg Vac and VistaManager for the Registry cleaning... and all three are very close to the same amount... found. I have never had any problems after running them. After running Reg Defrag which seems to work by compressing the registery and taking spaces out... there is about 3 to 5 secs shaved of reboot and boot start time ... so testing 2 of 3 Auslogic programs 1. Disk Defrag 2. Reg Defrag they do seem to work pretty good..and I have seen/had no problems with them Vista Ultimate 32Bit.
__________________ [COLOR="DarkRed"]The only Stupid Question is the one you failed to Ask![/color] [COLOR="Blue"]Beta Tester since Pre Win 95.[/COLOR] |
| (Offline) | |
| | #5 |
| Super Moderator Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Salisbury, UK
Posts: 2,355
| You are correct Snuffy, this issue is only for 64bit Vista. Before I removed the offending key the cleaner would scan perpetually until the keys were too long. This took it 16 hours and 125000 errors! Once I removed the key the scan took around 5 minutes and had 250 errors. crabby |
| (Offline) | |
| | #6 |
| ABXpert ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 3,628
| Sometimes I wonder about these applications. I ran Auslogics Registry Defrag and it indicated it has 527 errors, of course it's the free version and can only fix 20 of them. I then ran registry mechanic and found 97...not even closed to the 527. |
| (Offline) | |
| | #7 |
| Administrator ![]() Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Northwest England, UK
Posts: 1,157
| I saw a thing on TV once, Felix it will COME UP with 527 errors but its a maketing gimmick hence why you get diff results. I bet if you took the time to check them one by one you would find most of them to be fine.
__________________ Windows 7 rocks Microsoft! Vista was good too so don't knock it people! |
| (Offline) | |
| | #8 |
| ABXpert ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 3,628
| I agree. That's why it pays to try different software. I know the reg can get congested, specially when installing and uninstalling software, but trial software can be deceiving at best. |
| (Offline) | |
| | #9 | |
| Elite Members Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: S.W. Kansas
Posts: 2,841
| Quote:
Ref Defrag removes bad links and also removes many blank spots and lines to shorted the REG File... which makes it read faster - the difference in the amt of noted ERRORS.... Reg Mechanic , you really do not need to REBOOT... Auslogic Reg Defrag, you really should reboot after running.... Running the full version of Auslogics, and boot time is avg 4 to 5 s faster after running... what I do is using stop watch click Restart before I run Auslogics REG DEFRAG.... then rerun after the full version.. the least I found was 3s the most is 6s... with avg of 4s to 5s...
__________________ [COLOR="DarkRed"]The only Stupid Question is the one you failed to Ask![/color] [COLOR="Blue"]Beta Tester since Pre Win 95.[/COLOR] | |
| (Offline) | |
| | #10 |
| Junior Member Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: New Haven Indiana
Posts: 16
| Hi All New here. I use Perfect Disk. Defrags very well. It has a Reg Cleaner but I do not use it, It can somtimes cause more harm than do you any good. |
| (Offline) | |
| | #11 |
| Administrator ![]() Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Northwest England, UK
Posts: 1,157
| I say in bulit windows defrag run reg can be fine, I say however if you don't then use 3rd party.
__________________ Windows 7 rocks Microsoft! Vista was good too so don't knock it people! |
| (Offline) | |
| | #12 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Essex, UK
Posts: 431
| Can I just say, Welcome back Snuffy!
__________________ Host of the Vista Babble Podcast :cool: CCleaner is the best freeware ever! [B][I]I'm back...again! lol (Updated August 2008)[/I][/B] :lol: |
| (Offline) | |
| | #13 |
| Elite Members Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: S.W. Kansas
Posts: 2,841
| Yes, on The Welcome Back and Thanks... A Special Thanks to Wiggles, Ant and Crabby. I will try to much more conservative in the future. I do not use the DISK DEFRAG in Vista. grossy inadequate. (IMHO)..I do not use Perfect Disk - WAY to many problems during Beta Testing, and many still have too many problems...with Perfect Disk... I use Auslogisic Disk Defrag - SUPER FAST and I have never HAD a PROBLEM. even on C:\... my boot drive. Yes, I reboot after using.. 1m 30s avg time I use the REG CLEANER in Vista Manager and also "REG VAC" (written by a MS MVP) NEVER a PROBLEM with Either one... I use Auslogisic Registry Defrag... which current is rated as 1 of the BEST.. using the above mentioned 4 programs... I have found that I can increase my BOOT from COLD speed by 5s to 15s...keeping my avg time below 1m - my shutdown is lowered avg 15s to 25s. which as stated above REBOOT avg time is 1m 30s.. or less...
__________________ [COLOR="DarkRed"]The only Stupid Question is the one you failed to Ask![/color] [COLOR="Blue"]Beta Tester since Pre Win 95.[/COLOR] |
| (Offline) | |
| | #14 |
| ABXpert ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 3,628
| Other than a lack of GUI, Vista defrag is an excellent application. It takes a while to defrag the HD the first time it's run, but after that it runs on scheduled and out of site on the background. |
| (Offline) | |
| | #15 |
| Super Moderator Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Salisbury, UK
Posts: 2,355
| I would point out that defragmenting is a relic! crabby |
| (Offline) | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |