![]() | |
|
Welcome to the ABXZone Computer Forums forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 |
| Registered User Join Date: Mar 2001 Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 719
| Based on some prior postings (and a problem with my DVD drive), I ran the following benchmarks under HD TACH. The first is with the Intel Beta 2 drivers, then with no drivers other than what Windows '98SE installs when you remove the intel drivers, and then just with DMA. The following are two different drives, and the Max Read Speed/Min/Avg Read Speed/CPU Util IBM 30GB 75GXP ATA100 Intel Beta 2 Drivers - 39733/24490/34915/18.0% Nothing - 8028/6980/7913.4/96.2% DMA- 38413/19252/34509/6.0% WD 20GB ATA-66 Intel Beta 2 Drivers - 24775/17097/23657/5.5% Nothing - 6767/5821/6610/80.8% DMA - 24766/16672/23714/4.6% (Sorry - i had it as a chart, but the system didn't keep the formatting) It appears that DMA is only marginally worse in terms of speed, and infintely better in terms of CPU. Which should I do? Is DMA harmful? Thanks! |
| (Offline) | |
| Advertisement | [Remove Advertisement] |
| |
| | #2 |
| Registered User Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 53
| Use the DMA setting if the drive utilizes it OK. Although your benchmark might show DMA as the lower performer, it's still just a benchmark. The lower cpu utilization gives the cpu back more and faster than the other modes do...so.... |
| (Offline) | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |