![]() | |
|
Welcome to the ABXZone Computer Forums forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 |
| Registered User Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 770
| HD Suggestion and problem Hi, I had a 160gb SATA Western Digital drive and I wanted to get a second drive for Windows and security. I then got a Seagate 7200.9 SATA2 80gb drive. Now, I feel it a bit slow. Windows loading, file browsing seam slow.. I have a way to get nearly the full line of WD drive at good price (beside the Raptor 74 and 150) First question: What do you suggest to improve the speed of my main partition. Since I have critical file on this drive, I don't really like the Raid0 idea (might be a better idea for second hd) Should I go with the 36gb Raptor (even if it's quite old now) or get something else (160gb or more) I don't really need extra space (I currently use 15gb of my 80 drives) but I want speed. Second question: I installed HD Tach software to see the performance of my drives. Seagate 7200.9 SATA2 80gb 13.6ms 59.7mb/s 128.0MB/sec Western Digital 160gb SATA 20.3ms 52.7mb/s 124.2MB/sec Look like the drive isn't that slow (but it feel slow when browsing file !) But what is the 20.3ms of the WD drive ? this is terrible !! Thanks for your help and recommendation.
__________________ Pentium 4 2.8Ghz @ 3080Mhz Asus P4P800 DX 2x 512mb OCZ PC3500 WD 160gig SATA 8mb Asus Geforce 6600GT Termaltake 420W PFC Power Supply Silverstone TJ06 Case Windows XP Pro SP2 DirectX 9.0c 3DMarks 2001 PCMarks 2002 Last edited by Vric : 05-08-2006 at 04:00 PM. |
| (Offline) | |
| Advertisement | [Remove Advertisement] |
| |
| | #2 |
| Silicon Avatar Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Hyde Park, NY
Posts: 2,927
| since you seem to be more interested in speed then space the 36g raptor might be a good choice. If you were to create a raid 0 array as a boot drive you could still keep your important files on a seperate storage drive.
__________________ |
| (Offline) | |
| | #3 |
| Registered User Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 770
| Thanks for the reply What hold me to get the Raptor (so far) is the updated bench. From what I see, the 36gb is now slower than most 200gb drive, beside the access time. And since the Raptor 36gb is the same price as the 320gb SATA drive, I'm confused. As I said, I don't really mind the extra space, but if I get better performance from this drive, there is no point to get the Raptor (beside the "cool factor") Thanks for your help.
__________________ Pentium 4 2.8Ghz @ 3080Mhz Asus P4P800 DX 2x 512mb OCZ PC3500 WD 160gig SATA 8mb Asus Geforce 6600GT Termaltake 420W PFC Power Supply Silverstone TJ06 Case Windows XP Pro SP2 DirectX 9.0c 3DMarks 2001 PCMarks 2002 |
| (Offline) | |
| | #4 |
| Registered User Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 770
| I looked for the 20.3ms access time of my WD drive. The AAM is disable. I have no other clue what' going on.
__________________ Pentium 4 2.8Ghz @ 3080Mhz Asus P4P800 DX 2x 512mb OCZ PC3500 WD 160gig SATA 8mb Asus Geforce 6600GT Termaltake 420W PFC Power Supply Silverstone TJ06 Case Windows XP Pro SP2 DirectX 9.0c 3DMarks 2001 PCMarks 2002 |
| (Offline) | |
| | #5 |
| Registered User Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Jackson, Ca
Posts: 490
| Well, he told you to run them in Raid 0. Just try getting some extra 74gb Raptors and run them in Raid 0. You won't get much faster than that.
__________________ There's no such thing as a stupid question, just stupid people who ask questions. |
| (Offline) | |
| | #6 | |
| Registered User Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 770
| Quote:
I have a way to get nearly the full line of WD drive at good price (beside the Raptor 74 and 150) If I could get the 74gb at good price, I would surely get it. But I can only get the 36gb version, and I'm really not sure if it's still as fast at it was. (hd did improve the last 2 years..)
__________________ Pentium 4 2.8Ghz @ 3080Mhz Asus P4P800 DX 2x 512mb OCZ PC3500 WD 160gig SATA 8mb Asus Geforce 6600GT Termaltake 420W PFC Power Supply Silverstone TJ06 Case Windows XP Pro SP2 DirectX 9.0c 3DMarks 2001 PCMarks 2002 | |
| (Offline) | |
| | #7 |
| Registered User Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 256
| If you can get a good price on the 36gb raptor that would be a good choice. The access time can make a big difference in actual use if you are dealing with a lot of small files. That makes it a good choice for the os drive. A lot of bench tests only look at large sequential transfers which has nothing to do with how the os works. The price per gb is high on this drive but if you don't need the space it doesn't matter. |
| (Offline) | |
| | #8 |
| Registered User Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 770
| Thanks for the reply. I will take a look at it then. I can have it for $70 brand new (with full warrenty). But same price for the 320gb drive Last question, anyone have an idea why my WD 160gb have such an horrible access time ? 20.4ms is insane (and AAM is inactive)
__________________ Pentium 4 2.8Ghz @ 3080Mhz Asus P4P800 DX 2x 512mb OCZ PC3500 WD 160gig SATA 8mb Asus Geforce 6600GT Termaltake 420W PFC Power Supply Silverstone TJ06 Case Windows XP Pro SP2 DirectX 9.0c 3DMarks 2001 PCMarks 2002 Last edited by Vric : 05-08-2006 at 10:41 PM. |
| (Offline) | |
| | #9 |
| ABXpert Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Mpls MN
Posts: 1,615
| Something smells fishy. What are you running for anti virus software. Some anti virus programs kill hard drive performance Antivir comes to mind. Try disabling your AV program and see if it helps. I know when I tested Antivir about a year ago HD performance dropped by about 50%. How many processes are running on startup, have a look in task manager. If your much over 35 processes your system will start to feel lazy. I try to keep my systems trimmed to 30 or less. Oh and I take it defraging your drives has not helped? Malware could cause a system to feel slow. Use a online scan like trend house call just to be sure its not a malware problem.
__________________ C2Q Q6600 @ 3 Ghz*MSI P35 Neo2-FR bios 1.10*4x 2 gig Corsair XMS2 DDR2 800 ram*Evga 8800GT SSC *SATA HD's 1 Seagate 320 gig, 1 Samsung 320 gig *LiteOn sohw-1693s*Plextor PX 716a*Teac Floppy*OCZ 700GXSSLI PSU* Rosewill R6AR6-BK case*XP pro sp3 32 bit\Vista Ultimate 64 bit Good judgment comes from experience, and often experience comes from bad judgment. |
| (Offline) | |
| | #10 |
| Registered User Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 770
| Hi thanks for the reply. I have Symantec Antivirus Corporate 10. Defrag was made last week. There is no virus, no spyware. Computer is clean. I tried desabling the anti-virus, same thing. I tried in Safe mode. Everything is super slow (normal driver not loaded) but it's still 20.7ms (move from 20.3 to 20.7)
__________________ Pentium 4 2.8Ghz @ 3080Mhz Asus P4P800 DX 2x 512mb OCZ PC3500 WD 160gig SATA 8mb Asus Geforce 6600GT Termaltake 420W PFC Power Supply Silverstone TJ06 Case Windows XP Pro SP2 DirectX 9.0c 3DMarks 2001 PCMarks 2002 Last edited by Vric : 05-09-2006 at 09:14 AM. |
| (Offline) | |
| | #11 |
| Registered User Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 256
| The raptor would be faster but the extra 284gb of storage for the same price would be hard to pass up. Is both a possibility. A raptor for the os and that 320gb for storage. |
| (Offline) | |
| | #12 | |
| Registered User Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 770
| Quote:
My sensitive data (business wise) is about 3gb. All the rest is not a drama if something goes wrong. (well a drive failure is always a drama, but I'm a guy than make lot of backup and don't leave stuff there for infinite time.) It's all possible option.. It's hard to choose
__________________ Pentium 4 2.8Ghz @ 3080Mhz Asus P4P800 DX 2x 512mb OCZ PC3500 WD 160gig SATA 8mb Asus Geforce 6600GT Termaltake 420W PFC Power Supply Silverstone TJ06 Case Windows XP Pro SP2 DirectX 9.0c 3DMarks 2001 PCMarks 2002 | |
| (Offline) | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |