![]() | |
|
Welcome to the ABXZone Computer Forums forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 |
| Natural Born Killa Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: North Carolina USA
Posts: 331
| Seagate vs. Western Digital Hi Which 750Gb internal SATA2 hard disk drive is the best? Is it Western Digital or Seagate? Thanks NBK |
| (Offline) | |
| | #2 |
| C/TUSL2C/P4P800D/P5B-D Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: Sunny Florida, USA
Posts: 2,012
| Re: Seagate vs. Western Digital I have the WD. It is fast, quiet and cheaper than the Seagate. edit: the warranty is longer on the Seagate, unless you buy the WD RE2, but that one is a lot more expensive.
__________________ Proud Member: Team-CUSL2 - 'The Old School Crew' Current: P5B-D, E6600 @ 3.0, 4x1GB Crucial Ballistix PC8500, EVGA 8800GTS 512MB Old: P4P800-D, P4 2.4C @ 3.0, 4x512MB Mushkin PC3200, ATI AIW X800XT 256MB Older: TUSL2C, P3-S 1.4, 2x256MB Corsair XMS150, ATI 9800PRO 128MB, TB Santa Cruz Oldest: CUSL2, P3 1.0, 1x256MB & 2x128MB Corsair PC133, Asus V7700D 32MB, SB Live! |
| (Offline) | |
| | #3 |
| Just Plain Crazy! Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 3,278
| Re: Seagate vs. Western Digital My personal preference would be for the Western Digital.
__________________ Intel D975XBX2 Intel Core 2 Duo E6600 8GB's of Mushkin HP2 6400 memory(DDR2 800) two Sapphire GDDR4 Radeon 3870 videocards HT Omega Claro(Cmedia 8788HD chip) 120GB&200GB&320GB Western Digital harddrives LG DVDROM & LG DVDBURNER HP Deskjet 920C Logitech X-540 speakers Viewsonic VG2030wm 20inch Widescreen LCD Windows Vista Ultimate 64bit with Service Pack 1 Who'se the fool that approved the design for this place. - The Dwarf, Sacred Underworld. |
| (Offline) | |
| | #4 |
| Grab Life By The Balls ![]() Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Michigan
Posts: 7,830
| Re: Seagate vs. Western Digital Need to watch on some of the newer WD drives the rpms on the drivers run between 5400-7200rpm. I had good luck with seagate upto 320gb and wd upto 500gb. The bigger the drive the more heat it gives off. |
| (Offline) | |
| | #5 |
| Sleuth Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: It varies, but usually within 100 yards of a keyboard.
Posts: 7,212
| Re: Seagate vs. Western Digital I have been using Seagate drives for a few years now, but recently started purchasing Western Digital (again). I read a lot of negative reviews on the Seagate drives over at Newegg. I do not know if those reviews reflect reality or not, but it did influence my decision. I also had some reservations in the back of my mind as a result of Seagate's purchase of Maxtor, which had a reputation for making decent but cheap drives and I suspected that quality might take a nosedive. Finally, I think Seagate reduced their warranty and Western Digital strengthened theirs. |
| (Offline) | |
| | #6 |
| Grab Life By The Balls ![]() Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Michigan
Posts: 7,830
| Re: Seagate vs. Western Digital I know a lot of people and even me that had a lot of seagate drives fail. I never had a wd drive fail on me. |
| (Offline) | |
| | #7 |
| ... Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: NH, USA
Posts: 6,064
| Re: Seagate vs. Western Digital I'm a long time Seagate buyer, but I think their quality has slipped a bit (they do have the advantage of a 5yr warranty). Hence my last drive was a 500GB WD and I've just ordered a 150GB WD Raptor (using the 500 as backup NAS, and swapping the Raptor in as my main drive). So I'd likely go with WD for a 750 GB Drive if I needed one. My next HD purchase will likely be another WD 500 to run in Raid 1 with the existing 500GB drive). |
| (Offline) | |
| | #8 |
| Grab Life By The Balls ![]() Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Michigan
Posts: 7,830
| Re: Seagate vs. Western Digital Raptors are nice but they have a high failure rate. I have a few wd 500gb drives for my server and they are fast. |
| (Offline) | |
| | #9 |
| Thoroughly water-cooled Join Date: May 2003 Location: Somewhere, beyond the sea
Posts: 2,595
| Re: Seagate vs. Western Digital I have a mix of Seagate, WD and Maxtor drives in my machines -- prolly about a dozen in all. WD used to fail a lot while Seagate kept on ticking. During the past few years, however, it seems that WD has gotten better while Seagate has slipped. Maxtor has been a disappointment, too. |
| (Offline) | |
| | #10 | |
| The FC.Porto dragon! Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: Portugal
Posts: 3,930
| Re: Seagate vs. Western Digital Quote:
80GB and 200GB. My WD800JB still going strong! I think i'm going to get a WD 400GB or 500GB.
__________________ P4 3.0E@3.4, Zalman CNPS7000B-Alcu, Asus P4C800-E Deluxe, 2x 512MB DDR500 Twinmos Twister, Gigabyte Geforce 6800 128MB (OC 16x6vp 385/900), NEC 2500a 8x DVD+RW/-RW (flashed to dual layer 2510a), Liteon DVD-ROM 16X, Samsung 500GB SATA, Seagate 200GB SATA (lLinux), SB Live 1024 Player, USRobotics ADSL2+ router, PSU LC Power Ozeanos 650W, Samsung 17' 795MB Flat | |
| (Offline) | |
| | #11 |
| Grab Life By The Balls ![]() Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Michigan
Posts: 7,830
| Re: Seagate vs. Western Digital I had a few 200 and 300gb seagates and everyone failed. I used maxtor for a few years and had good luck with them, not sure how they are now. WD does seem to be doing a good job on there drives. |
| (Offline) | |
| | #12 |
| ... Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: NH, USA
Posts: 6,064
| Re: Seagate vs. Western Digital |
| (Offline) | |
| | #13 |
| Grab Life By The Balls ![]() Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Michigan
Posts: 7,830
| Re: Seagate vs. Western Digital |
| (Offline) | |
| | #14 |
| ABXpert Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Mpls MN
Posts: 1,606
| Re: Seagate vs. Western Digital I bought my first Seagate drive a 7200.10 320 gig on 04/02/07. Its still working without any troubles. The sad thing is its a dog as my old ide WD 160 gig was faster and quieter. I bought it because the warranty was 5 years. If I was going to do it again I'd be buying a Samsung spinpoint T or F1 series as they now have a 3 year warranty, was only a year when I bought my Seagate. The Samsung drives I have seen are silent very cool running and perform better than Seagate or WD 7200 rpm drives in most tests I have read on the net. Their 750 gig F1 is cheaper at newegg than Seagate or WD. Not many reviews on the new F1 series but this one looks like they have another winner. Samsung Spinpoint F1 HDDs: New Winners? | Tom's Hardware Newegg Newegg.com - SAMSUNG Spinpoint F1 HD753LJ 750GB 7200 RPM 32MB Cache SATA 3.0Gb/s Hard Drive - OEM
__________________ C2D E6400 @ 3 Ghz*MSI P35 Neo2-FR bios 1.8*4X 2 gigs DDR2 800 ram*Evga 8800GT SSC *SATA HD's 1 Seagate 320 gig, 1 Samsung 320 gig *LiteOn sohw-1693s*Plextor PX 716a*Teac Floppy*FSP AX450-PN PSU* Rosewill R6AR6-BK case*XP pro sp3 32 bit\Vista Ultimate 64 bit Good judgment comes from experience, and often experience comes from bad judgment. |
| (Offline) | |
| | #15 |
| ... Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: NH, USA
Posts: 6,064
| Re: Seagate vs. Western Digital |
| (Offline) | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |