ABXZone Computer  Forums



Welcome to the ABXZone Computer Forums forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-21-2005, 12:11 PM   #31
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 13,497

I doubt it would be much of a contest since kONGO is far more current than I am. And, has certainly spent much more time in applied math than I have from what I understand. I completed my degree 40+ years ago, and then devoted my interests to business, rather than pursue a scientific career. Unless, of course, we went into areas which I am still more familiar with: point-set and general topology and homological algebra.

As to being Nash in disguise? Well thanks for the question, but no, I am not in his league at all. You are talking true genius levels with people like that, and I certainly am not that category, no way even close to that.

I met and studied under some true geniuses, and they are just on a totally higher plane of intellectual capabilities. I met Einstein, studied under Norbert Weiner, Edward Lande, Aldous Huxley, Paul Samuelson and a few other notables, and their intellectual capabilities were/are awesome in the extreme.


Last edited by PCBruiser : 03-21-2005 at 12:17 PM.
(Offline)   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2005, 12:22 PM   #32
Xen now Citrix's
 
switch_abx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 2,609
that's what I thought as well. No magic.

Quote:
Originally Posted by BJB
I do not have a high level of math comprehension but I can usually appreciate a good problem/solution... though I don't know why this problem is so "unbelievable" or impressive.

From a visual standpoint, you see that in step 2 you put in the first three digits of your phone number, and in step 6&7 you input the last four digits of your phone number... and lo and behold at the end of the calculation these numbers are displayed together displaying your full 7 digit phone number.

It doesn't seem particularly amazing to me that this problem is able to come up with your exact phone number after you already typed it in. <shrugs> Perhaps it is more impressive from a purely mathematical standpoint.

BJB
(Offline)   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2005, 01:32 PM   #33
Patient upgrader
 
Viking's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: London
Posts: 265
Wow guys

What started out as a simple childs game has turned into Maths 101!

I wish you guys hadn't done all that though - brings back horrid memories of tutorials, seminars, lectures and exams - and I deliberately gave all that up years ago to focus on finance. Now I am going to have to go and dig out all my old text books from University days to remind me of what I have been missing.

Damn
__________________
Andy the Viking

My specs:

Main Rig: A8V Deluxe WiFi - Bios 1017 | AMD64 X2 4800+ | Corsair Value 1024 3200CAS3 | 120GB PATA WD Caviar SE | Leadtech 6600GT 128MB | WinXP Home SP2 | Asus 8324 CDRW | Chieftec Blue Dragon Case | Enermax 431 PSU | Acer Scanwit SCSI 2720 film scanner | Epson Stylus 950 USB Photo Printer

Kids Rig: CUSL2 (BIOS v1009) | PIII 800 running stock with Thermaltake Golden Orb cooler | 512 mb PC133 | Gainward Ultra 750-8X XP Golden Sample 128mb 3.3ns | Hercules Fortissimo III | 2 PATA WD SE HDs (80 / 40GB) | Promise PCI ATA controller card | Toshiba multi drive

Network: Netgear DG834GT ADSL Modem / Router | Belkin F5D7001UK PCI Card
(Offline)   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2005, 01:58 PM   #34
Helter Skelter
 
polonyc2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: New York City
Posts: 7,451
Quote:
Originally Posted by PCBruiser
I met and studied under some true geniuses, and they are just on a totally higher plane of intellectual capabilities. I met Einstein, studied under Norbert Weiner, Edward Lande, Aldous Huxley, Paul Samuelson and a few other notables, and their intellectual capabilities were/are awesome in the extreme.
very impressive group of people!!!....I did a search on the names that I did not recognize and they all had a profound impact in their particular fields....to actually have met them all and studied under them must have been an amazing experience, although I suppose that at the time you did not realize their true impact...legends are very rarely recognized as such until they are no longer with us....you really met Albert Einstein?...for some reason I always thought he had died much earlier but when I looked it up it listed his death as April 18, 1955 in Princeton, New Jersey.

__________________
ASUS Maximus Formula (X38) ***** EVGA 8800GT Superclocked 512MB
Intel E8400
***** Arctic Cooling Freezer 7 Pro
G.Skill 4 GB (2 X 2 GB) DDR2 800 4-4-4-12 *****
Western Digital RE2 500 GB WD5001ABYS
Lian Li PC-A70B (black)
***** Corsair HX620
AuzenTech Auzen X-Fi Prelude 7.1 *****
Creative Inspire P5800 5.1 speakers
Lite-On DVD-RW w/LightScribe LH-20A1L-06
***** Sony GDM-F520 21' CRT monitor (19.8' viewable)
Vista Business 64-bit w/SP1 *****
standard 3.5" floppy drive
Microsoft Laser Mouse 6000 ***** Microsoft Wired Keyboard 500 (Black)
(Offline)   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2005, 02:15 PM   #35
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 13,497
Yes, I actually did meet him in about 1953 or 4. My high school had a National Science Foundation grant to provide highly accelerated classes for kids that showed proficiencies in the sciences. By our senior year there we had completed two years of college level classes in math, chem, physics and biology. That was in a local New York City public High School, BTW. They arranged for a field trip to Princeton for us to attend one of his lectures there - didn't understand much, of course, but they also arranged for us to have dinner with him. Unbelieveable, truly incredible.

It was only shortly prior to that trip, while learning more about the man, that I discovered a letter he had written to FDR in which he was trying to convince Roosevelt that the Manhattan Project was critical to the US war efforts. I think the date of the letter was something like 1939 or 1940 IIRC, and in it he convinced (apparently) Roosevelt that Germany was actively pursuing "the bomb", and that it was technically possible. While Einstein was an active and ardent pacifist personally, he recognized that war with Germany was inevitable, and that for the good of mankind, the US had to get the bomb first - or else civilization as we knew it, and clearly any democratic instutitions were potentially doomed. In subsequently released classified information, it was revealed that Einstein's letter was the critical deciding factor for Roosevelt. Amazing story, isn't it?
(Offline)   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2005, 02:28 PM   #36
I'm gettin' dizzy!
 
Bofinn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 11,035
so who is alive today, that would be the equivalent of Einstein? Or at least top dog in the brain department?
__________________
---------- JimBo -----------



When in doubt, smack it!
(Offline)   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2005, 02:39 PM   #37
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 13,497
Probably the closest person from a public prospective, i.e., with a public persona and name recognition similar to Einstein, that matches his intellectual capabilities would be Stephen Hawking.
(Offline)   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2005, 02:51 PM   #38
Helter Skelter
 
polonyc2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: New York City
Posts: 7,451
I agree with Stephen Hawking...but in my opinion the last true genius was Francis Crick...Crick died last year...Crick not only co-discovered the structure of DNA but played a fundamental role in shaping the discipline of molecular biology...Perhaps there are still-living geniuses in fields such as movies, music, sports etc. (aka Steven Spielberg or Bobby Fischer) but I don't place those people on the same level as an Einstein, da Vinci etc.
__________________
ASUS Maximus Formula (X38) ***** EVGA 8800GT Superclocked 512MB
Intel E8400
***** Arctic Cooling Freezer 7 Pro
G.Skill 4 GB (2 X 2 GB) DDR2 800 4-4-4-12 *****
Western Digital RE2 500 GB WD5001ABYS
Lian Li PC-A70B (black)
***** Corsair HX620
AuzenTech Auzen X-Fi Prelude 7.1 *****
Creative Inspire P5800 5.1 speakers
Lite-On DVD-RW w/LightScribe LH-20A1L-06
***** Sony GDM-F520 21' CRT monitor (19.8' viewable)
Vista Business 64-bit w/SP1 *****
standard 3.5" floppy drive
Microsoft Laser Mouse 6000 ***** Microsoft Wired Keyboard 500 (Black)

Last edited by polonyc2 : 03-21-2005 at 03:02 PM.
(Offline)   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2005, 05:46 PM   #39
Just call me Dave
 
DBoone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: San Diego
Posts: 788
All I can say is Wow!! No wonder you guys are mods. Way over my head. In high schoo I hated math even though I was supposed to be good at it. Gave it up in 11th grade and regretted it terribly when I got to college.
(Offline)   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2005, 06:49 PM   #40
Stuck in Jita
 
Rick_EE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 1,025
Quote:
Originally Posted by polonyc2
I agree with Stephen Hawking...but in my opinion the last true genius was Francis Crick...Crick died last year...Crick not only co-discovered the structure of DNA but played a fundamental role in shaping the discipline of molecular biology...Perhaps there are still-living geniuses in fields such as movies, music, sports etc. (aka Steven Spielberg or Bobby Fischer) but I don't place those people on the same level as an Einstein, da Vinci etc.
I believe that they are there, but most of today's fields have progressed to the point that the public are simply not able to appreciate their work, or they work for corporations which will always be bigger than any one person.
__________________
"Your a looser"- internet phrase of the day.
(Offline)   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2005, 03:56 PM   #41
Resident ABX Wizard
 
Fraoch's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: London, Ontario
Posts: 8,814
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rick_EE
I believe that they are there, but most of today's fields have progressed to the point that the public are simply not able to appreciate their work, or they work for corporations which will always be bigger than any one person.
You hit the nail on the head here. Stephen Hawking is indeed the greatest genius currently living, but he's only widely known because of his books in which he attempts to explain these extraordinarily complex concepts to average people. Other geniuses that don't bother to write books in this manner are ignored by the general public, who are largely scientifically illiterate. I'm not talking advanced subjects here, I'm talking basic science. It's really pathetic. I doubt more than 50% of the population knows what an electron is.

Regarding Einstein and the bomb, what's scary is to realize that the V-2 could have delivered a nuclear device to England. Also Germany was working on an advanced V-2 that was truly an ICBM and was capable of reaching the U.S. I forget its name but it eventually became the Redstone missile when Werner Von Braun completed its design for the U.S.
(Offline)   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.1
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com