ABXZone Computer  Forums



Welcome to the ABXZone Computer Forums forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

Reply
 
LinkBack (7) Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-01-2006, 12:16 PM   #901
DP45SG/Q9650
 
Sandog's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Alabama
Posts: 6,199

Quote:
Originally Posted by GFORCE100
It's a never ending cycle, upgrade after upgrade after upgrade.

I would wait off until the C1 stepping.
Is that the second stepping of the D955EE core?

I understand all about upgrading hehe. I just would like to have a little more time between upgrades, especially when it involves EE chips which are hard to sell. I really want the 955EE but I also know I will definitely want the Conroe EE. If Intel had gotten it right I would be using a D955EE right now and not worry about the Conroe for another 6mos minimum.

__________________
<img src=http://sandog42.home.comcast.net/7.JPG border=0 alt= />
(Offline)   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2006, 12:21 PM   #902
DP45SG/Q9650
 
Sandog's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Alabama
Posts: 6,199
Quote:
Originally Posted by AHLnut
The new board has the low volume mic issue also?
Sure does, even with a different audio chip that has +0, +10, +20, +30, +40db microphone boost capability and also several versions later of Intel Audio Studio. The MIC input is totally useless. No conversing over VOIP, messenger software, or commmunication with team mates in online games.
__________________
<img src=http://sandog42.home.comcast.net/7.JPG border=0 alt= />
(Offline)   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2006, 01:16 PM   #903
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,203
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sandog
This is water cooled don't forget!!!
The chip is running at 75C after water cooling?? That is insane. Intel should incorporate phase change cooling if it is running that hot.

Those temps just turned me off 100%. Whats it run with a retail cooling solution, 100C, enough to boil water? I have no need, want or desire to have a toaster. I think those temps really present a hazard.

Shame on Intel.
(Offline)   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2006, 02:28 PM   #904
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,124
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zeppelin
The chip is running at 75C after water cooling?? That is insane. Intel should incorporate phase change cooling if it is running that hot.

Those temps just turned me off 100%. Whats it run with a retail cooling solution, 100C, enough to boil water? I have no need, want or desire to have a toaster. I think those temps really present a hazard.

Shame on Intel.
That temp Sandog has it o/ced to 4.2GHZ at full load!!! I'm sure at default speed the temps would be much lower, but still enough to replace the heater in your room
__________________
System 1 Asus A8N-SLI Premium - AMD X2 3800+ - OCZ 2x1GB EL Platinum - 2 BFG 7800GT OC in SLI - Soundblaster X-Fi - 2 36 GB Raptor in Raid 0 - WD 400KD - WD 250JB - Plextor PS-716A - Plextor 48x24x48 - Antec Neo-Power 480 - Antec Super Lanboy - WinXP Pro SP2.

System 2 Abit IC7 - 3.0C Intel CPU - 2x512 Geil Golden Dragon DDR433 - BFG 6800 GT OC - WD 200JB - Seagate 200GB 7200.7 - 3COM 905CX-TXNM NIC(PCI 2) - Audigy 2(PCI 3) - Plextor PX-708A DVD+- RW combo drive - Plextor 48x24x48 CD-RW drive - Antec 3700BQE case with TP430 PSU - XP SP2 slipstreamed.
(Offline)   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2006, 02:31 PM   #905
Registered User
 
Matt_G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Dacono, CO.
Posts: 130
Sandog, maybe you should post the temps at stock speed before poor ol Zep has himself an embolism.
__________________
"War is an ugly thing, but not the ugliest of things; the decayed and degraded state of moral and patriotic feeling which thinks nothing worth a war, is worse. A man who has nothing which he cares more about than he does about his personal safety is a miserable creature who has no chance at being free, unless made and kept so by the exertions of better men than himself."
John Stuart Mill
(Offline)   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2006, 04:11 PM   #906
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 392
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sandog
Is that the second stepping of the D955EE core?

I understand all about upgrading hehe. I just would like to have a little more time between upgrades, especially when it involves EE chips which are hard to sell. I really want the 955EE but I also know I will definitely want the Conroe EE. If Intel had gotten it right I would be using a D955EE right now and not worry about the Conroe for another 6mos minimum.
Yes C1 is the next one from the current B1.

If Intel can keep a potential 965 EE (i.e. 3.73GHz) version within the 05B thermal spec (i.e. 130W) then I believe there's a fair chance to welcome this model around the April timeframe, with the new stepping of course. It also depends on what AMD's doing but I would point my finger (yes I know it's rude) at a Pentium D 960 and a Pentium Extreme Edition 965 to follow on to what's already available.
(Offline)   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2006, 07:08 PM   #907
D 950 - Got a problem??
 
wicked_abx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 3
Ya the mic volume is low. However, after playing with some settings, my teammates in CS:S can hear me. Still not as good as it should be though.
(Offline)   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2006, 07:55 PM   #908
DP45SG/Q9650
 
Sandog's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Alabama
Posts: 6,199
Well he must be turning his volume way up to hear you.
__________________
<img src=http://sandog42.home.comcast.net/7.JPG border=0 alt= />
(Offline)   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2006, 10:36 AM   #909
DP45SG/Q9650
 
Sandog's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Alabama
Posts: 6,199
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zeppelin
The chip is running at 75C after water cooling?? That is insane. Intel should incorporate phase change cooling if it is running that hot.

Those temps just turned me off 100%. Whats it run with a retail cooling solution, 100C, enough to boil water? I have no need, want or desire to have a toaster. I think those temps really present a hazard.

Shame on Intel.
There is nothing I can do about that now except wait for Conroe. Don't forget the 840EE is two full blown 3.2GHz Prescotts w/1MB cache each side by side and then OC'd to 4.2GHz. At default 3.2GHz, the 840EE runs in the 50'sC and goes into low 60'sC when under load. Besides the heat, this processor runs excellent. Did I mention it runs well at 4.2GHz then drops to 2.8GHz at idle? That is freakin' neat. Also I ran 3DMark05 yesterday and scored over 8600 which is more than my buds 4000+ gets clocked higher than an FX-57.

Like I keep saying, I would love to get the 955EE with EIST but not if I only get to keep it for 3-4mos. I will probably just keep the 840EE and let it be my last Prescott.
__________________
<img src=http://sandog42.home.comcast.net/7.JPG border=0 alt= />
(Offline)   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2006, 01:05 PM   #910
The race for quality has no finish line- so technically, it's more like a death march.
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 18,159
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sandog
Like I keep saying, I would love to get the 955EE with EIST but not if I only get to keep it for 3-4mos. I will probably just keep the 840EE and let it be my last Prescott.
That's how I'm startin' to feel with my 830. June is not that far off. Plus I might have solved my problem with BOB. Not fully sure yet but it might be due to using PCIe based chipsets! It appears to work on my dual Xeon which fortunately has a Gigabyte 6600GT 8x AGP card in it. The USB chip being used in the Xeon: 82801, the USB chip used in the D955 board: 82801. So here I follow the recommendations for high-quality hardware only to find out it's no good. Instead of spending my money on the 9xx series of procs I will probably be spending my money on this highly expensive piece of equipment: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16814144209

It works with firewire which means I get to use one more piece of the D955 mobo and it does one thing that no other analog capture device can do - improve VHS quality during the capture! Does anyone know how much a person can charge for bringing a person's wedding video on VHS back from the grave to DVD format? That could help me out in seeing if my ROI on this equipment is good or not.
__________________

(Offline)   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2006, 01:14 PM   #911
DP45SG/Q9650
 
Sandog's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Alabama
Posts: 6,199
Intel_user, what is your opinion on these SPEC scores for Core Duo>

http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=29438
__________________
<img src=http://sandog42.home.comcast.net/7.JPG border=0 alt= />
(Offline)   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2006, 01:59 PM   #912
DP45SG/Q9650
 
Sandog's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Alabama
Posts: 6,199
Quote:
Originally Posted by pointreyes
That's how I'm startin' to feel with my 830. June is not that far off. Plus I might have solved my problem with BOB. Not fully sure yet but it might be due to using PCIe based chipsets! It appears to work on my dual Xeon which fortunately has a Gigabyte 6600GT 8x AGP card in it. The USB chip being used in the Xeon: 82801, the USB chip used in the D955 board: 82801. So here I follow the recommendations for high-quality hardware only to find out it's no good. Instead of spending my money on the 9xx series of procs I will probably be spending my money on this highly expensive piece of equipment: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16814144209

It works with firewire which means I get to use one more piece of the D955 mobo and it does one thing that no other analog capture device can do - improve VHS quality during the capture! Does anyone know how much a person can charge for bringing a person's wedding video on VHS back from the grave to DVD format? That could help me out in seeing if my ROI on this equipment is good or not.
Hey Pointy,

There will be new chipset boards out also which should contain the latest features and be more compatible with the lower wattage, higher FSB Conroes. I think these will be designated 965 chipsets and there should be some boards available without onboard graphics. These will not be the 'Enthusiast' board types like I am interested in so they will not have 2x16 PCIe or Dolby Digital capability but as I am not using those two technologies right now all I care about is which CPU's the boards can handle. Conroe EE maybe?
__________________
<img src=http://sandog42.home.comcast.net/7.JPG border=0 alt= />
(Offline)   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2006, 03:05 PM   #913
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,203
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sandog
There is nothing I can do about that now except wait for Conroe. Don't forget the 840EE is two full blown 3.2GHz Prescotts w/1MB cache each side by side and then OC'd to 4.2GHz. At default 3.2GHz, the 840EE runs in the 50'sC and goes into low 60'sC when under load. Besides the heat, this processor runs excellent. Did I mention it runs well at 4.2GHz then drops to 2.8GHz at idle? That is freakin' neat. Also I ran 3DMark05 yesterday and scored over 8600 which is more than my buds 4000+ gets clocked higher than an FX-57.

Like I keep saying, I would love to get the 955EE with EIST but not if I only get to keep it for 3-4mos. I will probably just keep the 840EE and let it be my last Prescott.
Us desert rats keep a close eye on things that generate heat. Makes no sense to pay for something to heat up the house and then run the AC to cool off the heat generator. If I had your rig, I would have to vent the WC unit outside!

The gains seem to be miniscule compared to the overhead. In gaming, I wonder if you can tell any difference between what you have now and the cooler running and quiet 3.4EE you had the PBZ. The biggest difference I can see is that you now have a better VC.

You are right, it might make better sense to wait for something that will actually make a difference. Wonder when the next revison of the MB will come out with a better audio? Will Intel do the right thing and offer to swap current boards for the one that has fixed Audio? Or will they just strut around with their noses in the air yelling "Sucker"?

How can Intel expect to appeal to an OC and game crowd without good audio?
(Offline)   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2006, 03:21 PM   #914
The race for quality has no finish line- so technically, it's more like a death march.
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 18,159
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sandog
Hey Pointy,

There will be new chipset boards out also which should contain the latest features and be more compatible with the lower wattage, higher FSB Conroes. I think these will be designated 965 chipsets and there should be some boards available without onboard graphics. These will not be the 'Enthusiast' board types like I am interested in so they will not have 2x16 PCIe or Dolby Digital capability but as I am not using those two technologies right now all I care about is which CPU's the boards can handle. Conroe EE maybe?
That sounds like a viable way to go. Yeah, I think I'm done with Prescotts. I mean seriously why waste $400+ on a heatwave proc when in June the cooler more efficient Conroe will be out. We are only talking 5 to 6 months now. I could be spending that time finally understanding this NLE software I have so that I can really test the Conroe really hard. Interestingly, my NLE software has the dolby digital license for output creation. On board firewire would be nice though. I always like it when a board has that on it.
__________________

(Offline)   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2006, 11:53 PM   #915
DP45SG/Q9650
 
Sandog's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Alabama
Posts: 6,199
This is pretty neat. By the way my processor runs fine in games at 4.2GHz. Haven't got it to pass 3DMark06 yet at 4.2GHz but it did 05 several times.
__________________
<img src=http://sandog42.home.comcast.net/7.JPG border=0 alt= />
(Offline)   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: http://www.abxzone.com/forums/f41/intel-d975xbx-bad-axe-98282.html
Posted By For Type Date
ABXZone.com This thread Refback 11-29-2006 03:03 PM
Intel Pentium Extreme Edition 955 (Presler) + Intel 975X PREVIEW! - [VR-Zone IT & Lifestyle Forum!] Post #1 Refback 11-26-2006 09:16 PM
Google Groups: alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt Post #1119 Refback 11-24-2006 12:21 AM
Device error, - Hardware Devices Post #1123 Refback 11-20-2006 05:27 AM
ASUSTeK Computer Inc.-Forum- This thread Refback 11-15-2006 06:36 AM
Unknown device - Page 2 - Windows BBS Post #1123 Refback 11-15-2006 06:30 AM
TipidPC.com | Intel Bad-Axe (D975XBX) orig Board This thread Refback 11-15-2006 02:01 AM


Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.1
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com