ABXZone Computer  Forums



Welcome to the ABXZone Computer Forums forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
Why not Register and remove some of the ads from The ABXZone

 
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-01-2003, 11:32 AM   #61
Bite me if u can...
 
JoeBar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Athens
Posts: 5,889
Quote:
Originally posted by BBThumper
......if I can watch and download a good porno, at the same time, then my system is stable ..............
__________________
Asus P5WDG2 Premium rev. 1.02G
Intel Pentium D 920 SL94S Malay @ 4.31GHz cooled by Thermaltake Big Water 745
GeCube Radeon X1900XT combined with LG 1980Q (8ms) 19' TFT monitor
2 x 1GB Transcend DDR2-533 @ 770mhz
2 x 36.7GB Western Digital Raptors Raid 0 | 300GB Western Digital Caviar SE SATA
Creative Soundblaster X-Fi Xtrememusic combined with Cambridge Soundworks Megaworks 550 THX
Asus E616P3 DVD | Asus 1608-P DVD-RW
Thermaltake Kandalf black super tower with 4 x 120mm and 2 x 90mm blue led fans | Chieftec 550W Triple 12V rails - 120mm fan
(Offline)   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2003, 11:23 PM   #62
What happens if I touch..
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Surrey B.C. Canada Eh!
Posts: 63
Well using DanX's tips, I have been fortunate enouhg to get my 2.8C up to 3.43 stable enough to game with, had it up to 3.5 and could surf, mail ect. but anything much heavier, and it would crash on me.

Goin to keep trying to monkey with it on and off to see if I can't get it to stabalize at 3.5 (maybe a bit more) once I get it's final home finished off. More would be nice, but I am definetly not complaining with it at 3.4+
__________________
Humans, weird pets for weird Ferrets!

Proud member of the [MC]clan!
Don't make the crew come after you!
(Offline)   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2003, 07:30 AM   #63
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 37
Hiya,

I'm new to this thread, so correct me if I've missed something. Here's the thing:

I OC'd my machine to a FSB of 233 (OEM DDR400 running 1:1@466, i know, ***??)
It's running stable at this speed on all default voltages and PAT enabled. 3DMark03 = 6k+

The thing is that my goal is to get a higher framerate for better gaming-performance, but 233FSB doesn't really make a big difference with running 200FSB (only 200 points in 3DMark03), so I thought it would be cool to OC to 3,5Ghz (FSB250) with mem running at stock speed (400DDR). With default voltages and PAT enabled, it crashes during 3DMark03 (blue screen) and restarts. The framerates sofar though, are pretty F$#%^%$ high!!!!

So, mem is dual channel @ 2.5-3-3-8-8, timing @ 0T, refresh @ 64uSec, PAT enabled, vcore @ 1.525, vdimm @ 2.55, vagp @ 1.5.....

How do I get it stable @ 3.5Ghz? Do I need to up the vdimm, or the vcore, and to what values????

One more question. Whenever i turn on the TURBO mode, my computer won't boot even when all default values are set???
Is this the memory???

Update:
P4C800-E Deluxe
2.8C
2 x OEM DDR400 512MB in Dual Channel
2 x Maxtor 120GB SATA 8M on ICH5R
Hercules Prohpet 9800PRO
Zalman 7000A-AlCu
4 Coolermate ALU led fans (2 intakes front, 2 outtakes rear)
1 x 90mm fan (intake side)
1 x 80mm fan (intake side)

Last edited by OC-Otto : 12-03-2003 at 07:36 AM.
(Offline)   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2003, 08:02 AM   #64
-_-
 
enroscado's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Argentina
Posts: 390
Try this:
Idle time: Infinite
Refresh: 15,6 uSec
VDimm: 2.75/2.85
Vagp: 1.6
MAYBE you'll have to up your vcore, hopefully not.

Turbo mode only works at 200FSB, and it changes timings to 2-2-2-5, so maybe thats why you pc doesn't boot.
__________________
www.losvagos.net
(Offline)   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2003, 08:17 AM   #65
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 37
Quote:
Originally posted by enroscado
Try this:
Idle time: Infinite
Refresh: 15,6 uSec
VDimm: 2.75/2.85
Vagp: 1.6
MAYBE you'll have to up your vcore, hopefully not.

Turbo mode only works at 200FSB, and it changes timings to 2-2-2-5, so maybe thats why you pc doesn't boot.

enroscado, thanks for your reply.

I'm still wondering why there's people out there stating that they've enabled TURBO mode with FSB > 250 and noticed a difference in sandra?? Also, who sells 2-2-2-5 mem? If i up the vdimm, will my mem suddenly be able to take CAS 2 instead of 2.5??? I wouldn't think so, but then again; how are so many people able to turn on TURBO mode?? I'm confused...

I'm at work right now, but i'm gonna try upping the vdimm (and vagp) as soon as i get home. Is it best to put Idle time and Refresh on auto first and then start testing with lower values each run, or is Idle time Infinite and Refresh 15,6 uSec a more relaxed timing to start testing from??
(Sofar, 0T and 64uSec gave me the best results in sandra)
(Offline)   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2003, 08:52 AM   #66
-_-
 
enroscado's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Argentina
Posts: 390
Actually, i should of made it clear, that worked the best for ME.
You can always check DanX's tips, i found them quite precise.

In my case, if i enable TURBO at 201+, i see NOTHING different, but when at 200, timings change to 2-2-2-5 automatically, regardless of what i put.

My memory is rated 2-2-2-6, so that's whay i can boot easily 2-2-2-5, plus i made a vdimm mod, and it handles 2-2-2-5 at FSB240.

If your memory is CAS2.5, probably won't be able to run CAS2 even if you up the vdimm, but since you want to use a FSB of 250, you may leave turbo enabled and it should be fine.

You say you are confused about TURBO? You are not alone, almost everybody is.

About Idle time and Refresh Rate, again, that worked best for me, but you should test in your PC, making ONE CHANGE AT A TIME, so you can clearly tell what was, and write your results down.

Cheers!
__________________
www.losvagos.net
(Offline)   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2003, 09:48 AM   #67
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 13,880
Quote:
Originally posted by OC-Otto
I'm still wondering why there's people out there stating that they've enabled TURBO mode with FSB > 250 and noticed a difference in sandra??
I can only tell you what my system does. I run at 256 FSB and when Turbo is enabled, my Sandra score increases. I can only speak for myself. I will run some more tests when I have time later and try to get to you. I think there are a lot of myths out there about what Turbo does and doesn't do.
(Offline)   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2003, 11:03 AM   #68
Happy, Joyous and Free
 
BBThumper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Philly
Posts: 2,024
......how about this one, I have found more than a few people who, like myself, can only run turbo. If I put it in standard or auto I cannot boot..............
__________________
ASUS M3A32-MVP Deluxe
AMD Phenom 9600
XP-90c w/ a T.T. 92mm fan
2 x 2gig pc26400
Nvidia 8400
2 x Raptors in Raid 0

......My City's moto: Welcome to Philly, now get the heck out!!!!!!!
(Offline)   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2003, 11:56 AM   #69
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Britland
Posts: 108
Is it the option in the chipset setup page you are talking about?

If so, I can set mine at any setting, it doesn't cause any crashes, and makes no change to performance whatsoever.

I was thinking maybe ASUS decided to put it there to increase the apparent "tweakability" of the board.
__________________
ASUS P4C800-E Deluxe || 2.4C @ ? || 1Gb OCZ EL DDR PC-3500 Dual Channel Platinum Limited Edition || Radeon 9800 Pro || Audigy 2 || Inspire 6700 || 60Gb IBM || 20Gb Maxtor || Chieftec Blue Dragon || Enermax EG651P-VE FMA 550w || Vantec Nexus || Thermalright SP-94 || Vantec Tornado || 4 x Panaflo 80mm
(Offline)   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2003, 12:06 PM   #70
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 37
I've started testing just now.

Haven't changed the voltages yet...

These are my results sofar (running 3DMark03):
Idle timer @ 0T
Refresh Rate @ 64uSec
Causes BSOD during "CPU Test 1" (no white letters this time????)

Idle timer @ Auto
Refresh Rate @ Auto
Causes BSOD with BAD_POOL_CALLER error during "CPU Test 2"

Idle timer @ Infinite
Refresh Rate @ 7.8uSec
Causes BSOD during "CPU Test 1" (no white letters this time????)

Idle timer @ 64T
Refresh Rate @ 7.8uSec !update! or 15.6uSec
Causes 3DMark03 to exit to windows during "CPU Test 2", but no BSOD!!!

Idle timer @ 64T
Refresh Rate @ 64uSec
Causes 3DMark03 to freeze during "Game Test 2", but no BSOD!!!

Idle timer @ 64T
Refresh Rate @ 64T
Causes reboot during "Game Test 2"

Changed vdimm to 2.65:
Idle timer @ 0T
Refresh Rate @ 64uSec
Causes 3DMark03 to exit to windows during "CPU Test 1", no BSOD

Idle timer @ Infinite
Refresh Rate @ 64uSec or 15.6uSec
Causes 3DMark03 to exit to windows during "CPU Test 2", no BSOD

I guess no BSOD's anymore running on 2.65v, but I doubt it will be stable at this voltage.

Changed vdimm to 2.75:
Idle timer @ 0T
Refresh Rate @ 64uSec
Causes 3DMark03 to exit to windows during "CPU Test 2", no BSOD

Idle timer @ Infinite
Refresh Rate @ 15.6uSec
Causes BSOD without the info again....

Starting to **** me off. I think I'm gonna get me a pair of Corsair's TWINX!!

Now I'm getting lower mem bandwidth in sandra, but as soon as it's stable I'm gonna try and tweak mem settings from there to try and increase the bandwidth again (had it up to 5700MB/s when running @3.26 and mem @466). The main goal is still to increase framerate and getting a higher 3DMark03 score with my 9800 Pro slightly overclocked to 498/344.

I'll keep posting my results!!
__________________
Intel Pentium 4C 2.8Ghz@3150Mhz
P4C800-E Deluxe
2 x OEM DDR400 512MB in Dual Channel
2 x Maxtor 120GB SATA 8M on ICH5R RAID0
Hercules 3D Prohpet 9800 PRO
Zalman 7000A-AlCu
4 Coolermate ALU led fans (2 intakes front, 2 outtakes rear)
1 x 90mm fan (intake side)
1 x 80mm fan (intake side)

Last edited by OC-Otto : 12-03-2003 at 04:07 PM.
(Offline)   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2003, 12:19 PM   #71
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 37
Should I disable "spread spectrum" and "ich delayed transcation" and if yes; for what reason??
__________________
Intel Pentium 4C 2.8Ghz@3150Mhz
P4C800-E Deluxe
2 x OEM DDR400 512MB in Dual Channel
2 x Maxtor 120GB SATA 8M on ICH5R RAID0
Hercules 3D Prohpet 9800 PRO
Zalman 7000A-AlCu
4 Coolermate ALU led fans (2 intakes front, 2 outtakes rear)
1 x 90mm fan (intake side)
1 x 80mm fan (intake side)
(Offline)   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2003, 12:24 PM   #72
Bite me if u can...
 
JoeBar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Athens
Posts: 5,889
I have ich delayed transaction enabled.
Spread spectrum set to disabled.
__________________
Asus P5WDG2 Premium rev. 1.02G
Intel Pentium D 920 SL94S Malay @ 4.31GHz cooled by Thermaltake Big Water 745
GeCube Radeon X1900XT combined with LG 1980Q (8ms) 19' TFT monitor
2 x 1GB Transcend DDR2-533 @ 770mhz
2 x 36.7GB Western Digital Raptors Raid 0 | 300GB Western Digital Caviar SE SATA
Creative Soundblaster X-Fi Xtrememusic combined with Cambridge Soundworks Megaworks 550 THX
Asus E616P3 DVD | Asus 1608-P DVD-RW
Thermaltake Kandalf black super tower with 4 x 120mm and 2 x 90mm blue led fans | Chieftec 550W Triple 12V rails - 120mm fan
(Offline)   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2003, 01:10 PM   #73
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 13,880
Quote:
Originally posted by OC-Otto
Should I disable "spread spectrum" and "ich delayed transcation" and if yes; for what reason??
Spread spectrum allows you to reduce electro-magnetic interference (EMI) on your motherboard. But it can cause your system to become unstable if you're overclocking. Therefore it should be turned off. Regarding ICH delayed transaction, I've never heard a really good explanation. But my system works better when it's enabled.
(Offline)   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2003, 01:35 PM   #74
-_-
 
enroscado's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Argentina
Posts: 390
OC-Otto, since you're testing your system mainly, and not your video card, you should consider benching with 3DMark2001 SE, since it is much more system deppendant when compared to 2k3.

Of course, you can still use 2k3's CPU tests to test stability.

But, after that, you should consider some hours of memtest and/or prime95 to make sure it is relly stable.
__________________
www.losvagos.net
(Offline)   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2003, 01:39 PM   #75
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 37
That's was actually the plan. But I figured it should be able to run all of these programs without a hickup anyway.....

As soon as I'm able to run 3DMark03 flawless (looks like I'm getting there), I'll start benching using prime95 and 2001SE.
__________________
Intel Pentium 4C 2.8Ghz@3150Mhz
P4C800-E Deluxe
2 x OEM DDR400 512MB in Dual Channel
2 x Maxtor 120GB SATA 8M on ICH5R RAID0
Hercules 3D Prohpet 9800 PRO
Zalman 7000A-AlCu
4 Coolermate ALU led fans (2 intakes front, 2 outtakes rear)
1 x 90mm fan (intake side)
1 x 80mm fan (intake side)
(Offline)   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.1
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com