Tusl2-C + Tualatin = 1404Mhz! - Page 5

Zbone · 09-26-2001, 07:02 PM

My 3DMark2001 scores on average 7243 default test.

RedWing9 · 10-24-2001, 03:16 PM

Have you heard anything from MAD about this? I tried email about a week ago. Is there no more chance for this tweak to happen? Have they given up?

hrcprc · 11-12-2001, 03:26 AM

hi i got tusl2-c and celeron 1.2@1.44 ,and g2 ti. my scoe at 3d mark 2001 is 3800 . is this good?

Zbone · 11-12-2001, 07:59 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by hrcprc
hi i got tusl2-c and celeron 1.2@1.44 ,and g2 ti. my scoe at 3d mark 2001 is 3800 . is this good?

Considering that it's a Geforce 2 Ti, that's a pretty good score. My original Geforce 3 scored around that with a P3 1Ghz and the baseline drivers.

Z

hrcprc · 11-13-2001, 03:17 AM

the score 3800 at 3d mark 2001 is in windows xp!last night i put on my machine win 98se and score is 4128!
i culdnt belive what is the difference betwine this two os!
p.s. ive clocked my celeron 1.2@1.45 ,voltage is the same as 1.2 core

GreyFalcon · 12-02-2001, 09:26 AM

I'm just about to order my prosessor. I see the great results for the 1.2Gig. Is there any problem with the 1.26 512MB cacsh? I'm not really sure which one to get.

Zbone · 12-02-2001, 12:36 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by GreyFalcon
I'm just about to order my prosessor. I see the great results for the 1.2Gig. Is there any problem with the 1.26 512MB cacsh? I'm not really sure which one to get.

I know a lot of people with the 1.26 512 cache have problems with the cpu voltage adjustments. I do not believe it's a big problem though. Outside of that it runs fine and overclocks well.

Z

GreyFalcon · 12-02-2001, 04:24 PM

Does that mean that you can adjust your voltages with your 1.2. I'm also running the TUSL2-C with the 1010 BIOS. What is the 1010tc, and where do you get it? I just switched from the BIOS mod for the CUSL2-C, that works fine on the TUSL2-C, in anticipation of the new processor, and am now using the Dos BIOS tweak by the Mad. It's slower in loading, and I don't like that it won't allow for the 5,7 memory setting, but so far those are just minor complaints. I don't usually use the voltage adjustments to overclock. My 700E runs at 1000MHz just fine without tweaking the voltage, and I don't plan to go much over 150MHz FSB with the new prosessor. I ordered the Alpha cooler that you are using about a week ago with the noisy high RPM fan, but I also got the 60MM to 80MM fan reducer, and a higher output 80MM fan than the 60MM that comes with the Alpha, in case I couldn't stand the noise. I think it will work in my case, but I got it both ways just in case ( no pun intended). I have the Arctic silver, for small surface areas, but that should be ok, for the heat spreader, I would think. I swear the stuff is just antiseaze compound for automotive high heat applications, but I haven't run any conduction tests on it yet to see. I've got the Gainward GeForce3 on my Christmas list. Any opinions on which way to go would be nice. The 512MB cache is tempting, but if it is a problem on my motherboard, I could always buy another computer toy with the $50-60 I would save getting the 1.2Gig. This is the last computer I intend to build until the P4's really take off, or until the P5's are out with the 64 bit OS's, so I want to get as much out of it as I can. I'm a spoiled oldtimer from the 440BX days. I still don't think they have built a comparable performance board since then. Todays boards don't outperform it by a whole lot. I'm waiting for the next generation board that makes the leap that that the 440BX did. I might be waiting a while.

Zbone · 12-02-2001, 06:25 PM

I'm using the 1010tc bios and it does allow voltage adjustments. I'm also using Stuffpcr and the dos fix to get my AGP at 4x above 140 fsb. If I had a choice I'd go with the 1.26 w/ 512 cache. It is the fastest PIII to date.

This month the P4 DDR motherboards come out. Why not build a P4 system around PC2100 DDR ram? Your performance will double and you can get a much faster P4 for the same price as the 1.26 PIII.

aagiants · 02-14-2002, 10:28 PM

according to the asus webpage, the tusl2c wont run the p3-s line.. unless they changed that with new bios

bajo · 02-15-2002, 12:14 PM

[quote]Originally posted by Zbone
[b] If I had a choice I'd go with the 1.26 w/ 512 cache. It is the fastest PIII to date.

Actually, it would be 1.4 Gig now

CATCH22ATPLAY · 02-18-2002, 05:08 AM

LOL 1404mhz should have gotten a Celeron for O/Cing

dash-dot-dash · 02-21-2002, 02:14 PM

Is the 1.2 GHz Celeron your rig?

If it is, how did you cool the CPU to -54C?

-.-

dash-dot-dash · 02-21-2002, 02:16 PM

IMPRESSIVE.

CATCH22ATPLAY · 02-25-2002, 06:12 AM

haha you think i'll give away all my secrets? Dude check this out. I got my 1.2G Tualain running on my ABIT BX-133 RAID mobo now. Hell it only took 8 pins to do it. SO what does this mean? Well any Tualatin will run on damn near any socket 370 mobo made in the last couple years. Also with a 9th pin the 1.4 server PIII Tualatin should work too. I'll have to test that one to make sure though. I screwed up one of my 1.2G Celerons trying to make this work. But it was a POS and didn't O/C too good. Gotta break an egg every now and then. Stay tuned for article at a website near you.

here's a compare but just remember this is a trial run at 133FSB Tualatin on a BX mobo
http://gamershq.madonion.com/compare2k1.shtml?2851966

09-26-2001, 07:02 PM	#61
Zbone PC Fanatic Join Date: May 2001 Location: USA, WISCONSIN Posts: 229	My 3DMark2001 scores on average 7243 default test. __________________ Asus P4C800 Deluxe (Bios v.1014) Intel P4 3.0c 800fsb currently @221fsb 3.315Ghz Cooler Master IHC-H71 Everest HSF 1024megs (2x512mb) OCZ PC3500 Ltd. Edition memory @2-2-3-6 1:1 70Gig HDD (2x36.7Gig Raptor 10,000rpm SATA in RAID 0) BFG Geforce FX 5900 Ultra 256meg 500/900 Sblaster Audigy2 with Promedia GMX DD5.1 Logitech MX300 Mouse Yamaha CRW-F1 CD-R/RW Pioneer 16x DVD Antec TruePower 550 PSU Windows XP Pro
(Offline)

10-24-2001, 03:16 PM	#62
RedWing9 Lord Stanley will stay... Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Chicago Area Posts: 35	Tweaked TUSL2-C bios Have you heard anything from MAD about this? I tried email about a week ago. Is there no more chance for this tweak to happen? Have they given up?
(Offline)

11-12-2001, 03:26 AM	#63
hrcprc Registered User Join Date: Nov 2001 Location: croatia , zagreb Posts: 2	hi i got tusl2-c and celeron 1.2@1.44 ,and g2 ti. my scoe at 3d mark 2001 is 3800 . is this good?
(Offline)

11-13-2001, 03:17 AM	#65
hrcprc Registered User Join Date: Nov 2001 Location: croatia , zagreb Posts: 2	the score 3800 at 3d mark 2001 is in windows xp!last night i put on my machine win 98se and score is 4128! i culdnt belive what is the difference betwine this two os! p.s. ive clocked my celeron 1.2@1.45 ,voltage is the same as 1.2 core
(Offline)

12-02-2001, 09:26 AM	#66
GreyFalcon Registered User Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: Virginia Posts: 46	? I'm just about to order my prosessor. I see the great results for the 1.2Gig. Is there any problem with the 1.26 512MB cacsh? I'm not really sure which one to get.
(Offline)

12-02-2001, 04:24 PM	#68
GreyFalcon Registered User Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: Virginia Posts: 46	Re: ? Does that mean that you can adjust your voltages with your 1.2. I'm also running the TUSL2-C with the 1010 BIOS. What is the 1010tc, and where do you get it? I just switched from the BIOS mod for the CUSL2-C, that works fine on the TUSL2-C, in anticipation of the new processor, and am now using the Dos BIOS tweak by the Mad. It's slower in loading, and I don't like that it won't allow for the 5,7 memory setting, but so far those are just minor complaints. I don't usually use the voltage adjustments to overclock. My 700E runs at 1000MHz just fine without tweaking the voltage, and I don't plan to go much over 150MHz FSB with the new prosessor. I ordered the Alpha cooler that you are using about a week ago with the noisy high RPM fan, but I also got the 60MM to 80MM fan reducer, and a higher output 80MM fan than the 60MM that comes with the Alpha, in case I couldn't stand the noise. I think it will work in my case, but I got it both ways just in case ( no pun intended). I have the Arctic silver, for small surface areas, but that should be ok, for the heat spreader, I would think. I swear the stuff is just antiseaze compound for automotive high heat applications, but I haven't run any conduction tests on it yet to see. I've got the Gainward GeForce3 on my Christmas list. Any opinions on which way to go would be nice. The 512MB cache is tempting, but if it is a problem on my motherboard, I could always buy another computer toy with the $50-60 I would save getting the 1.2Gig. This is the last computer I intend to build until the P4's really take off, or until the P5's are out with the 64 bit OS's, so I want to get as much out of it as I can. I'm a spoiled oldtimer from the 440BX days. I still don't think they have built a comparable performance board since then. Todays boards don't outperform it by a whole lot. I'm waiting for the next generation board that makes the leap that that the 440BX did. I might be waiting a while.
(Offline)

12-02-2001, 06:25 PM	#69
Zbone PC Fanatic Join Date: May 2001 Location: USA, WISCONSIN Posts: 229	I'm using the 1010tc bios and it does allow voltage adjustments. I'm also using Stuffpcr and the dos fix to get my AGP at 4x above 140 fsb. If I had a choice I'd go with the 1.26 w/ 512 cache. It is the fastest PIII to date. This month the P4 DDR motherboards come out. Why not build a P4 system around PC2100 DDR ram? Your performance will double and you can get a much faster P4 for the same price as the 1.26 PIII. __________________ Asus P4C800 Deluxe (Bios v.1014) Intel P4 3.0c 800fsb currently @221fsb 3.315Ghz Cooler Master IHC-H71 Everest HSF 1024megs (2x512mb) OCZ PC3500 Ltd. Edition memory @2-2-3-6 1:1 70Gig HDD (2x36.7Gig Raptor 10,000rpm SATA in RAID 0) BFG Geforce FX 5900 Ultra 256meg 500/900 Sblaster Audigy2 with Promedia GMX DD5.1 Logitech MX300 Mouse Yamaha CRW-F1 CD-R/RW Pioneer 16x DVD Antec TruePower 550 PSU Windows XP Pro
(Offline)

02-14-2002, 10:28 PM	#70
aagiants Registered User Join Date: Feb 2002 Posts: 94	according to the asus webpage, the tusl2c wont run the p3-s line.. unless they changed that with new bios
(Offline)

02-15-2002, 12:14 PM	#71
bajo C1eaner Join Date: Feb 2001 Location: TX, USA Posts: 17,176	[quote]Originally posted by Zbone [b] If I had a choice I'd go with the 1.26 w/ 512 cache. It is the fastest PIII to date. Actually, it would be 1.4 Gig now __________________ USA "I won't be wronged, I won't be insulted, and I won't be laid a hand on. I don't do these things to other people, and I require the same from them." Duke (The Shootist) Gigabyte_AGP_LGA775, PentiumD960_dual core 3.6GHz, SapphireHD3850_AGP512MB_DDR2, WD RaptorX 150GB SATA_clearTop_16MB + Seagate 1TB SATA_32MB, CorsairDominator 2GB 8500_1066MHz, Dell 24" 2408WFP *AGP +DVIx2 +HDMI +DisplayPort +USB2x4, XPproSP3 Inspiron9400 17"uxga CentrinoC2duoT7600_2.39GHz_685MHz 4GB Micron6400@800_675_400MHz GeForceGo7900GSMobileForce_M6Enhanced_256MB 2x200GbSATA_7200rpm_16MBcache Vista hp, VistaP6001SP1
(Offline)

02-18-2002, 05:08 AM	#72
CATCH22ATPLAY S.O.B. Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: The Beach in California Posts: 63	LOL 1404mhz should have gotten a Celeron for O/Cing __________________ CATCH22ATPLAY VR-ZONE 3DMARK TEAM CELERON1.2G@1.656G GF4@360/750 3DMARK2k1 DEFAULT BENCH 10,734 http://service.madonion.com/compare?2k1=3204181 new P4 score with R9700 and ANUS P4T533 mobo default bench bah 19k+ http://service.madonion.com/compare?2k1=4666224 P4 2.66@3.30 R9700@483.75/411.75 6,673 marks
(Offline)

02-21-2002, 02:14 PM	#73
dash-dot-dash Your wish is My Command! Join Date: Jun 2001 Location: NJ, USA Posts: 628	Catch22! Is the 1.2 GHz Celeron your rig? If it is, how did you cool the CPU to -54C? -.- __________________ E6700 @ 3400 MHz GA-965P-DQ6 w/2048 MB Corsair PC8500 @ 1023 MHz VCore 1.40V 800 MB RAID0/2 x SATA300 WD 400GB ATI X1900XTX CF (2 Radeon SLI cards) Realtek HD Audio Antec case w/700W OCZ ps Water Cooling WinXP Final SR2
(Offline)

02-21-2002, 02:16 PM	#74
dash-dot-dash Your wish is My Command! Join Date: Jun 2001 Location: NJ, USA Posts: 628	I want a set of those! IMPRESSIVE. __________________ E6700 @ 3400 MHz GA-965P-DQ6 w/2048 MB Corsair PC8500 @ 1023 MHz VCore 1.40V 800 MB RAID0/2 x SATA300 WD 400GB ATI X1900XTX CF (2 Radeon SLI cards) Realtek HD Audio Antec case w/700W OCZ ps Water Cooling WinXP Final SR2
(Offline)

02-25-2002, 06:12 AM	#75
CATCH22ATPLAY S.O.B. Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: The Beach in California Posts: 63	haha you think i'll give away all my secrets? Dude check this out. I got my 1.2G Tualain running on my ABIT BX-133 RAID mobo now. Hell it only took 8 pins to do it. SO what does this mean? Well any Tualatin will run on damn near any socket 370 mobo made in the last couple years. Also with a 9th pin the 1.4 server PIII Tualatin should work too. I'll have to test that one to make sure though. I screwed up one of my 1.2G Celerons trying to make this work. But it was a POS and didn't O/C too good. Gotta break an egg every now and then. Stay tuned for article at a website near you. here's a compare but just remember this is a trial run at 133FSB Tualatin on a BX mobo http://gamershq.madonion.com/compare2k1.shtml?2851966 __________________ CATCH22ATPLAY VR-ZONE 3DMARK TEAM CELERON1.2G@1.656G GF4@360/750 3DMARK2k1 DEFAULT BENCH 10,734 http://service.madonion.com/compare?2k1=3204181 new P4 score with R9700 and ANUS P4T533 mobo default bench bah 19k+ http://service.madonion.com/compare?2k1=4666224 P4 2.66@3.30 R9700@483.75/411.75 6,673 marks
(Offline)

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode