ABXZone Computer  Forums



Welcome to the ABXZone Computer Forums forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-09-2004, 02:22 AM   #1
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 35
centrino help

was looking for a laptop with a 3.2 ghz processor..
but have found that the centrino's tho rated at like 1.4 ghz actually go at 2.4

can anyone explain this more in depth? I am confused..is this something like the amd + idea?

I had an inspiron 8200 1.6ghz P3 and it was way to sloow for what I do...digital photography... and that was why I was looking for a 3.2ghz.....and was not looking for a centrino as they only went to about 2ghz..am I reading this whole thing wrong? can someone explain or point me to a resource? thanks..t
__________________
Asus P4C800-E Deluxe
P4 3.2GHZ HT
2GB Crucial P3200 RAM
Radeon 9700 Pro
Hitachi DVD Rom
Panasonic Lf 521
2 80 gb Maxtor HDD
LiLian Case
Windows XP Pro
Digidoc 5
Cornerstone 21" Monitor
And I don't Overclock...
(Offline)   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2004, 02:38 AM   #2
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 35
also

what is the difference between a p4 3.2, an p4 M 3.2, and a centrino?
Is the centrino and the M not the same? is the M and the regular p4 3.2 the same? I am all mixed up now...thanks...t
__________________
Asus P4C800-E Deluxe
P4 3.2GHZ HT
2GB Crucial P3200 RAM
Radeon 9700 Pro
Hitachi DVD Rom
Panasonic Lf 521
2 80 gb Maxtor HDD
LiLian Case
Windows XP Pro
Digidoc 5
Cornerstone 21" Monitor
And I don't Overclock...
(Offline)   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2004, 02:53 AM   #3
Non-expert
 
BoWevil_abx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Traveling full time
Posts: 1,857
According to some of ther discussion threads here the Centrino processors are much faster (and cooler running) than their rated speeds would indicate. These same threads explained the difference between a p4 and A P4 M. I'll see if I can find the discussion threads.

Check these out.

Can someone explain Centrino to me?

Pentium M or Pentium 4M?

Pentium-M Centrino

Last edited by BoWevil : 06-09-2004 at 02:59 AM.
(Offline)   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2004, 03:23 AM   #4
The Shade of Lazarus
 
KingTermite's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: PM me to keep in contact
Posts: 26,003
Check the other threads that BoWevil posted, but quick answer is that no it is not a concept like AMD uses for processor naming. It uses a different architecture (e.g. not "pentium") which is apparently better because they get the same "performance" of higher clocked pentiums.

It's just how when pentiums first came out and people didn't understand why a P-60 (60 MHz) was faster than a 476 DX4 100 (100 MHz). A centrino outperforms pentiums of the same clock speed because of a better architecture.

The second benefit is that it seems to be an extremely low-power architecture. A laptop with a regular pentium processor would last about an hour, a Pentium-M (mobile) would last in the 2-3 hour range where centrino would last in the 5 hour or so range.
__________________

Bye Bye ABXZone.....Rest In Peace.
(Offline)   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2004, 03:50 AM   #5
C1eaner
 
bajo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: TX, USA
Posts: 17,178
also, I'd go for the new centrino dothan, 2.0ghz/755chipset - much more power & 2mb l2cache(!), less power usage...
__________________
USA "I won't be wronged, I won't be insulted, and I won't be laid a hand on. I don't do these things to other people, and I require the same from them." Duke (The Shootist)

Gigabyte_AGP_LGA775, PentiumD960_dual core 3.6GHz, SapphireHD3850_AGP512MB_DDR2, WD RaptorX 150GB SATA_clearTop_16MB + Seagate 1TB SATA_32MB, CorsairDominator 2GB 8500_1066MHz, Dell 24" 2408WFP *AGP +DVIx2 +HDMI +DisplayPort +USB2x4, XPproSP3
Inspiron9400 17"uxga CentrinoC2duoT7600_2.39GHz_685MHz 4GB Micron6400@800_675_400MHz GeForceGo7900GSMobileForce_M6Enhanced_256MB 2x200GbSATA_7200rpm_16MBcache Vista hp, VistaP6001SP1
(Offline)   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2004, 01:38 AM   #6
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 35
ok after researching and discussing here and elsewhere, I understand more about the centrino, M's and so on..
But a question still lingers and I just thought of how to phrase it so it comes out as I mean it to..



what are the, if any, performance advantages of the centrino 2.0ghz(I assume this is the dothan) over the P4 3.2ghz?
battery time, or the heat aside and I know the centrino uses 3 components and all of that.


I guess what I am asking is if you multiply the centrino by whatever factor, 1.4, or 1.6 to get the equivalent of the P4 model, let's say the 2.0 is the equivalent of a P4 3.3ghz, then why not call it a centrino 3.3ghz or p4 M 3.3ghz instead of a 2.0 ghz? there has to be some loss or something it can't do that the 3.2ghz p4 can or some reason it is called a 2ghz instead of 3.3ghz..HT aside...
And doesn't, (and if so, how) how much affect does the lower 400mhz FSB have vs the 800?
thanks..t
__________________
Asus P4C800-E Deluxe
P4 3.2GHZ HT
2GB Crucial P3200 RAM
Radeon 9700 Pro
Hitachi DVD Rom
Panasonic Lf 521
2 80 gb Maxtor HDD
LiLian Case
Windows XP Pro
Digidoc 5
Cornerstone 21" Monitor
And I don't Overclock...
(Offline)   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2004, 08:22 AM   #7
Linux user
 
yamawho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Montreal
Posts: 4,070
Quote:
Originally Posted by KingTermite
Check the other threads that BoWevil posted, but quick answer is that no it is not a concept like AMD uses for processor naming. It uses a different architecture (e.g. not "pentium") which is apparently better because they get the same "performance" of higher clocked pentiums.

It's just how when pentiums first came out and people didn't understand why a P-60 (60 MHz) was faster than a 476 DX4 100 (100 MHz). A centrino outperforms pentiums of the same clock speed because of a better architecture.

The second benefit is that it seems to be an extremely low-power architecture. A laptop with a regular pentium processor would last about an hour, a Pentium-M (mobile) would last in the 2-3 hour range where centrino would last in the 5 hour or so range.
I was wondering about the differences myself ... good post king
__________________
(Offline)   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2004, 09:39 AM   #8
Registered User
 
Mark_Venture's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Wilmington, DE, USA
Posts: 330
Quote:
Originally Posted by dv13
....I guess what I am asking is if you multiply the centrino by whatever factor, 1.4, or 1.6 to get the equivalent of the P4 model, let's say the 2.0 is the equivalent of a P4 3.3ghz, then why not call it a centrino 3.3ghz or p4 M 3.3ghz instead of a 2.0 ghz? there has to be some loss or something it can't do that the 3.2ghz p4 can or some reason it is called a 2ghz instead of 3.3ghz..HT aside...
Well, intel has pushed and promoted using the REAL internal clock speeds (Hz or cycles per second) of the chip when naming/advertising them. So a 2.0Ghz Intel chip runs at 2.0Ghz inside no matter how it performs. Unlike AMD who has been using "processor ratings" which relate more to the chip's real world performance and then keeping the internal clock speed of the chip in the background of the ad.

So you can have two intel chips running at different (clock) speeds inside that get the work done about the same time frame. After reading about the P4 2.8C vs P4 2.8E, you would agree these are Both 2.8Ghz Pentium 4 chips, but we know their insides are slightly different (cache size, pipeline, etc) yet the results of bench mark testing show they perform differently. You would probably also agree that a Celeron running at a particular clock speed does not get things done as fast as a a Pentium 4 running at that same clock speed, right? But yet they are each described by their internal clock speed.

Because of the different internal design of the Pentium-M processor, it can do the same amount of work in the same time without having to work as "hard". So it can work with less cycles per seconds (Hz or clock speed), and get the same work done as the P-4M.

In the past, Intel dismissed and even spoke out against AMD's "processor rating" type description, but now they are now starting to see the light and will be chaning how they label their chips in the future. They are not exactly going to use the same way as AMD does, but they are going to rely less on actual internal clock speed when naming/numbering their chips.
__________________
PrimaryPC: P4 3.2C | Asus P4C800-E DLX | 2x512Mb Kingston HyperX PC3500 DualChan/Perf Mode On | InWin Q500a w/Antec TruePower 430 | Gainward Ultra/750-8X GoldenSample (Geforce 4 ti4800se) | Hauppauge WinTV Theater PCI | Adaptec 2940U2W LVD pci scsi | SBLive! Value | FMI/Mitsumi 3.5 Internal Floppy Drive & 7-In-1 Media Reader (FA404M) | 120 Gig Maxtor Ultra Series DM9 | 300 Gig Maxtor Ultra Series DM10 | Lite-On SOHD-167T DVDrom | Lite-On SOHW-1693S DVD+/-RW | Lite-On LTR52327S cdrw | Fujitsu 3.5"R/W optical | Seagate LVD 20/40 gig 4MM DDS-4 DAT tape drive
Other Systems: Click HERE
(Offline)   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2004, 09:58 AM   #9
ABXpert
 
izibo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 1,679
also, it is worth noting that centrino actually refers to the chipset of the notebook... just like the intel 875 which is in the p4c800-e. the pentium M is the actual processor which can be used by the centrino chipset
(Offline)   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2004, 10:08 AM   #10
ABX Public Relations
 
sammy2066's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: ABXZone.com
Posts: 8,544
its actually plain and simple .....

pentium 4 3.2Ghz = Desktop Chip in a Laptop with same power consumption = good performance but low battery life

pentium 4 -m 3.2ghz = handpicked pentium 4 3.2ghz procs which can do 3.2ghz @ a lower voltage thus reducing the heat dissipation and power consumption.

pentium - m centrino = very refined and efficient processor architecture + higher performance @ lower clock speed + lower heat dissipation

in short ...... pentium m can very efficiently do what you want to do .....
__________________
That's what she said ....
(Offline)   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2004, 10:21 AM   #11
The Shade of Lazarus
 
KingTermite's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: PM me to keep in contact
Posts: 26,003
Quote:
Originally Posted by sammy2066
pentium 4 -m 3.2ghz = handpicked pentium 4 3.2ghz procs which can do 3.2ghz @ a lower voltage thus reducing the heat dissipation and power consumption.
They aren't just the same as the regular processors hand picked that are able to operate at lower voltage. They are also different processors that are designed to run with lower power. It's the same processor.
__________________

Bye Bye ABXZone.....Rest In Peace.
(Offline)   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2004, 10:25 AM   #12
ABX Public Relations
 
sammy2066's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: ABXZone.com
Posts: 8,544
ooh .... ok .... now i get it ...

thnx for enlightening me ..... Lord KT :wave2:
__________________
That's what she said ....
(Offline)   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2004, 10:28 AM   #13
The Shade of Lazarus
 
KingTermite's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: PM me to keep in contact
Posts: 26,003
Quote:
Originally Posted by sammy2066
ooh .... ok .... now i get it ...

thnx for enlightening me ..... Lord KT :wave2:
I just wanted to make clear that they are "designed" that way.

I also hear people sometimes think that companies like Intel and AMD made a CPUs that are the same and then "test" them to see what clock speeds they can support and label them that way.

This too is FALSE....they are "designed" for the clock speed they are run at...engineering is a science, not guesswork. They know before the chips are ever processed what clock speed they will run at.
__________________

Bye Bye ABXZone.....Rest In Peace.
(Offline)   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2004, 10:32 AM   #14
ABX Public Relations
 
sammy2066's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: ABXZone.com
Posts: 8,544
ook ....
__________________
That's what she said ....
(Offline)   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2004, 10:50 AM   #15
The race for quality has no finish line- so technically, it's more like a death march.
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 18,159
The procs to consider are the following at newegg:
http://www.newegg.com/app/ViewProduc...111-159&depa=0
http://www.newegg.com/app/ViewProduc...111-160&depa=0

These are the Dothan cored procs. GamePC now has a review on the Dothan here: http://www.gamepc.com/labs/view_cont...othan20&page=1

Centrino is not really a processor, it's the Pentium-M 7xx series that are the Dothans. The P4 line that consist of the Northwoods and Prescott I believe will be the 5xx series.

I wonder what will be 666?
__________________

(Offline)   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.1
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com