Post Your 3Dmark 05 Scores Here !!! - Page 26

eva2000 · 01-05-2006, 07:22 AM

WOOHOO!

HIS X1800XT + Acetal Maze4 Low profile GPU block
@803/945

3dmark05 = 11,749
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=1655759

Tried higher HTT and managed 1pt more LOL

HIS X1800XT + Acetal Maze4 Low profile GPU block
@803/945

3dmark05 = 11,750
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=1655918

BKA · 01-06-2006, 02:56 PM

Got two new XFX 6800GS, managed to sqeeze 10661 out of them so far. When I get time I'm going to clean the HS's and replace with some AS5 and see how much further I can go.

SpeedDMN · 01-07-2006, 02:48 AM

Greetings all, After many problems and one major disater involving water cooling. (probably can guess where that is going) I have my rig up, running, and blessedly stable. I am finally getting to do some benchmarks. I received 13652 in 3Dmark05 at it's stock settings. I think I should note that I have a slight OC on the CPU to an even 3.0g. That was achieved simply by raising the multiplier from 14x to 15x and raising the core voltage from 1.4v to 1.5v My specs are in my profile. I just haven't gotten around to making a decent sig yet. Peace!

eva2000 · 01-07-2006, 12:05 PM

512MB HIS X1800XT with Acetal Maze4 waterblock
@810/972

3dmark05 = 11,904
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=1666337

SpeedDMN · 01-07-2006, 01:47 PM

Pretty impressive scores there eva! I am particuarly interested in the 14,402 score with a rig fairly similar to mine. I have the "ultra" versions of those vcards so by all rights I would think I would achive a higher score. It looks like your OC on the FX/57 proved to be a huge increase. I tried lowering the multiplier down to 12x with 256HTT and was a no post. in fact it locked the second I typed the 6. If you don't mind my asking... What voltages did you use at those frequencies? I used to have that very same mobo but had some major bios issues. I probably just needed a new bios chip but after I had a vga waterblock leak that fried one of my vcards and the bottom PCiE slot I opted for the Abit fatality. Nice very stable board though I wish I had better luck with the DFI. I just didn't want to go through the no post to cmos even at stock settings ever again. I liked the layout of the DFI much better than the Abit. I think a drunk chinaman designed the floppy and molex connector right under the last pci slot among other things. Anyway, any insight you care to give me would be appreciated. Thanks!

Ford Freak · 01-07-2006, 05:55 PM

He is using the Opteron 170 in that benchmark.

SpeedDMN · 01-07-2006, 06:10 PM

ohhh ok I thought something was strange. I guess I should have read a little more thoroughly. Hell of a score with any chip

eva2000 · 01-08-2006, 03:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ford Freak

He is using the Opteron 170 in that benchmark.

nah SLI score was single core cpu = FX=57

512MB HIS X1800XT with Acetal Maze4 waterblock
@816/981

3dmark05 = 11,983
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=1671041

SpeedDMN · 01-08-2006, 08:54 PM

damn then I was right in the OC on the CPU making such a huge difference in score. My board doesn't like that setting. Have you had any bios problems with the lanparty board? I see you just have a slight increase in core voltage like where I have it now. 12x? Something just doesn't seem right maybe you can explain it to me. It would make more sense if I wasn't running the ultra versions of the 7800GTX (can hit 600/1800 no problem) but I have a feeling even if I used the same cpu clock settings I still wouldn't jump much above 14400. Like I said I never got to benchmarking with the dfi mobo (the very same you have) it never was up long enough and I had to cross my fingers everytime to get through cmos. Now there is a board that should have had ccmos on the front panel lol. A new bios chip and I might have been alright though.

BKA · 01-08-2006, 10:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SpeedDMN

Greetings all, After many problems and one major disater involving water cooling. (probably can guess where that is going) I have my rig up, running, and blessedly stable. I am finally getting to do some benchmarks. I received 13652 in 3Dmark05 at it's stock settings. I think I should note that I have a slight OC on the CPU to an even 3.0g. That was achieved simply by raising the multiplier from 14x to 15x and raising the core voltage from 1.4v to 1.5v My specs are in my profile. I just haven't gotten around to making a decent sig yet. Peace!

Nice score. I'm using same MB as you are and have been able to get as high as 10661. I have a feeling wih some tweaks I may be able to break 11,000. I am having trouble getting higher than 2.8 on my 3700 though. And my 6800GS's already came OC'd out of the box so I may have hit a wall. Still proud of my score though.

Give us a link so we can do a compare.

SpeedDMN · 01-09-2006, 01:55 PM

Hey your score is nothing to balk at. I mean any score over 10000 and you will be in gaming heaven in real life application. I'm afraid these boards just are not for the hardcore overclocker. Mine doesn't like me to raise the HTT much at all at any multiplier setting. I do wish the DFI board had worked out better for me but if you had seen the crap I went through with it's tissue paper bios you would know what I mean. Maybe I just got a lemon but after I had to get a new one anyway I opted for the Abit. I'm really not sorry for the choice since all those probs I had before simply went away. Everyone in the DFI forum was saying it your memory timings or power supply etc. I was like bullsh__ it's the damn mobo! But then you see scores like VGA up there beating mine with less video and I wish it had worked out better. The abit wont hit those settings. 256HTT? forget about it. Still I am surprised he got so high with even that clock. I was hoping he would explain it to me but I guess he just shows off and runs lol.

SpeedDMN · 01-09-2006, 01:58 PM

P.S. I will get a link but I have to use the free one to do it. It wont let me post to futuremark with my hacked pro version

SpeedDMN · 01-09-2006, 05:16 PM

Well I tried to post a link to my scores but it wont let me. Says I need to post more than a few times. Give me a break

gocchin · 01-09-2006, 11:53 PM

Not as good as I'd like... this is with my old FX-57, got a new one that benches at 3.825ghz and a dual core 4800+ that does around 3.4ghz but haven't been able to get it all together yet to beat this score from like a month ago....

17,609

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=1561784

Here's what I ran before that with the cards on stock air no mods:

SpeedDMN · 01-10-2006, 01:33 AM

that actually makes me feel better. looks like I'm benching about where I should be at stock speeds. 3.85? wow fastest I read about was 3.65 and that was with phase change. I'll never see it. I can't aford to torch my $1000 chip not to mention have a spare one. must be nice

01-05-2006, 07:22 AM	#376
eva2000 Registered User Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: Brisbane, Australia Posts: 1,673	WOOHOO! HIS X1800XT + Acetal Maze4 Low profile GPU block @803/945 3dmark05 = 11,749 http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=1655759 Tried higher HTT and managed 1pt more LOL HIS X1800XT + Acetal Maze4 Low profile GPU block @803/945 3dmark05 = 11,750 http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=1655918 __________________ * DFI LP UT X48-T3RS DDR3 + 2x512MB HIS IceQ3 Turbo HD3850 CF Last edited by eva2000 : 01-05-2006 at 07:34 AM.
(Offline)

01-06-2006, 02:56 PM	#377
BKA Registered User Join Date: Feb 2003 Posts: 2,093	Got two new XFX 6800GS, managed to sqeeze 10661 out of them so far. When I get time I'm going to clean the HS's and replace with some AS5 and see how much further I can go. __________________ DFI LT X48-T2R Q9450@3.2 2-3870(CF) 4GB Patriot Viper Vista x64 ULT
(Offline)

01-07-2006, 02:48 AM	#378
SpeedDMN Silicon Avatar Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Hyde Park, NY Posts: 2,927	3Dmark05 score Greetings all, After many problems and one major disater involving water cooling. (probably can guess where that is going) I have my rig up, running, and blessedly stable. I am finally getting to do some benchmarks. I received 13652 in 3Dmark05 at it's stock settings. I think I should note that I have a slight OC on the CPU to an even 3.0g. That was achieved simply by raising the multiplier from 14x to 15x and raising the core voltage from 1.4v to 1.5v My specs are in my profile. I just haven't gotten around to making a decent sig yet. Peace!
(Offline)

01-07-2006, 12:05 PM	#379
eva2000 Registered User Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: Brisbane, Australia Posts: 1,673	512MB HIS X1800XT with Acetal Maze4 waterblock @810/972 3dmark05 = 11,904 http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=1666337 __________________ * DFI LP UT X48-T3RS DDR3 + 2x512MB HIS IceQ3 Turbo HD3850 CF
(Offline)

01-07-2006, 01:47 PM	#380
SpeedDMN Silicon Avatar Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Hyde Park, NY Posts: 2,927	Pretty impressive scores there eva! I am particuarly interested in the 14,402 score with a rig fairly similar to mine. I have the "ultra" versions of those vcards so by all rights I would think I would achive a higher score. It looks like your OC on the FX/57 proved to be a huge increase. I tried lowering the multiplier down to 12x with 256HTT and was a no post. in fact it locked the second I typed the 6. If you don't mind my asking... What voltages did you use at those frequencies? I used to have that very same mobo but had some major bios issues. I probably just needed a new bios chip but after I had a vga waterblock leak that fried one of my vcards and the bottom PCiE slot I opted for the Abit fatality. Nice very stable board though I wish I had better luck with the DFI. I just didn't want to go through the no post to cmos even at stock settings ever again. I liked the layout of the DFI much better than the Abit. I think a drunk chinaman designed the floppy and molex connector right under the last pci slot among other things. Anyway, any insight you care to give me would be appreciated. Thanks!
(Offline)

01-07-2006, 05:55 PM	#381
Ford Freak warranty voider Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Valdosta, GA Posts: 3,823	He is using the Opteron 170 in that benchmark. __________________
(Offline)

01-07-2006, 06:10 PM	#382
SpeedDMN Silicon Avatar Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Hyde Park, NY Posts: 2,927	ohhh ok I thought something was strange. I guess I should have read a little more thoroughly. Hell of a score with any chip Last edited by SpeedDMN : 01-07-2006 at 06:16 PM.
(Offline)

01-08-2006, 08:54 PM	#384
SpeedDMN Silicon Avatar Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Hyde Park, NY Posts: 2,927	damn then I was right in the OC on the CPU making such a huge difference in score. My board doesn't like that setting. Have you had any bios problems with the lanparty board? I see you just have a slight increase in core voltage like where I have it now. 12x? Something just doesn't seem right maybe you can explain it to me. It would make more sense if I wasn't running the ultra versions of the 7800GTX (can hit 600/1800 no problem) but I have a feeling even if I used the same cpu clock settings I still wouldn't jump much above 14400. Like I said I never got to benchmarking with the dfi mobo (the very same you have) it never was up long enough and I had to cross my fingers everytime to get through cmos. Now there is a board that should have had ccmos on the front panel lol. A new bios chip and I might have been alright though.
(Offline)

01-09-2006, 01:55 PM	#386
SpeedDMN Silicon Avatar Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Hyde Park, NY Posts: 2,927	Hey your score is nothing to balk at. I mean any score over 10000 and you will be in gaming heaven in real life application. I'm afraid these boards just are not for the hardcore overclocker. Mine doesn't like me to raise the HTT much at all at any multiplier setting. I do wish the DFI board had worked out better for me but if you had seen the crap I went through with it's tissue paper bios you would know what I mean. Maybe I just got a lemon but after I had to get a new one anyway I opted for the Abit. I'm really not sorry for the choice since all those probs I had before simply went away. Everyone in the DFI forum was saying it your memory timings or power supply etc. I was like bullsh__ it's the damn mobo! But then you see scores like VGA up there beating mine with less video and I wish it had worked out better. The abit wont hit those settings. 256HTT? forget about it. Still I am surprised he got so high with even that clock. I was hoping he would explain it to me but I guess he just shows off and runs lol.
(Offline)

01-09-2006, 01:58 PM	#387
SpeedDMN Silicon Avatar Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Hyde Park, NY Posts: 2,927	P.S. I will get a link but I have to use the free one to do it. It wont let me post to futuremark with my hacked pro version
(Offline)

01-09-2006, 05:16 PM	#388
SpeedDMN Silicon Avatar Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Hyde Park, NY Posts: 2,927	Well I tried to post a link to my scores but it wont let me. Says I need to post more than a few times. Give me a break
(Offline)

01-09-2006, 11:53 PM	#389
gocchin Itsumo Gocchin!! Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Sometimes Toronto, sometimes Tokyo Posts: 578	Not as good as I'd like... this is with my old FX-57, got a new one that benches at 3.825ghz and a dual core 4800+ that does around 3.4ghz but haven't been able to get it all together yet to beat this score from like a month ago.... 17,609 http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=1561784 Here's what I ran before that with the cards on stock air no mods: __________________ Check out JPOP OVERCLOCK my personal Overclocking and Jpop Blog!!
(Offline)

01-10-2006, 01:33 AM	#390
SpeedDMN Silicon Avatar Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Hyde Park, NY Posts: 2,927	that actually makes me feel better. looks like I'm benching about where I should be at stock speeds. 3.85? wow fastest I read about was 3.65 and that was with phase change. I'll never see it. I can't aford to torch my $1000 chip not to mention have a spare one. must be nice
(Offline)

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode