| |
 |  AMD Legacy AMD Platform Discussions Legacy AMD Platform Discussions Discuss Is DDR400 Required for Dual Channel Support?? in the AMD forums; So where do people that only have a 266MHz CPU stand?? Should I still run it in sync with the ... |
|
Welcome to the ABXZone Computer Forums forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. |
 |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
03-29-2003, 03:10 PM
| #16 |
| Registered User Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,017
| So where do people that only have a 266MHz CPU stand?? Should I still run it in sync with the proccessor  or push it as close to 400MHz as I can?Steve A7N8X-Deluxe XP2000+ 1GB PC3200 Samsung
__________________ Spaz ----- "Those who would sacrifice liberty for security deserve neither." -- paraphrased from Benjamin Franklin. ----- Move into my city! Spaztowne Improve my city's streets! Click here! Open a factory in my city! Click here! |
| (Offline) |  |
|
03-29-2003, 03:33 PM
| #17 |
| ...  Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: NH, USA
Posts: 6,078
| Sync, as high as you can go 
__________________ |
| (Offline) | |
|
03-29-2003, 03:46 PM
| #18 | |
| The race for quality has no finish line- so technically, it's more like a death march.  Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 18,159
| Quote:
| |
| (Offline) | |
|
03-29-2003, 04:26 PM
| #19 |
| ... Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: NH, USA
Posts: 6,078
| Oops  That was supposed to be 29xx, fixed it I'll do unbuffed later. And thanks, I'm really glad I have a board a like - so far this is the best motherboard I've ever owned 
__________________ |
| (Offline) | |
|
03-31-2003, 06:38 PM
| #20 |
| ... Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: NH, USA
Posts: 6,078
| I got 1571/1681 unbuffered @207MHz, a bit on the low side I'd say. I actually got high number with more relaxed timings (around 1600/1700) - odd.
__________________ |
| (Offline) | |
|
03-31-2003, 06:51 PM
| #21 | |
| The race for quality has no finish line- so technically, it's more like a death march. Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 18,159
| Quote:
 The unbuffered is definitely a good test for checking this though. | |
| (Offline) | |
|
03-31-2003, 07:00 PM
| #22 |
| Registered User Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 24
| What Bios what bios are you guys using I cannot get mine to work at all |
| (Offline) | |
|
03-31-2003, 07:09 PM
| #23 | |
| The race for quality has no finish line- so technically, it's more like a death march. Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 18,159
| Re: What Bios Quote:
 I'm using the Epox 8rda and XJ is using the Abit NF7 (at least, I believe that is the name of his board). | |
| (Offline) | |
|
03-31-2003, 08:05 PM
| #24 | |
| ... Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: NH, USA
Posts: 6,078
| But I do get better buffered scores with higher clocks - and I'd imagine that buffered scores are more directly related to typical program use than unbuffered. Weird though. My board is the Abit NF7-S. Quote:
__________________ | |
| (Offline) | |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Linear Mode
