![]() | |
|
Welcome to the ABXZone Computer Forums forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 |
| I'd rather be sailing... Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: USA
Posts: 266
| I have an AMD X2 4800+ on an A8N32-SLI board. I also Fold @ 80% CPU utilization (go Team 1714)! I'm wondering if it's better to set Affinity to, say, 1 for the Folding executable, thereby confining it to one CPU only (leaving the other CPU "free"), or not set any Affinity, thus letting the Folding load balance across both CPU's @40% utilization each. Anyone have any thoughts on which is better? Duke
__________________ Asus A8N32-SLI w/A64 4800+ 1.40 vcore; 1103 bios Zalman 7000B-ALCu HSF w/AS5 2 WD 74 GB Raptors (Raid 0) w/WindowsXP SP2 Corsair TwinX3500LLPRO 2x1gig @2.7V 2-3-2-6 1T ATI X1800XL SLI card |
| (Offline) | |
| | #2 |
| Mmmm..... Folding@Home Join Date: Sep 2001 Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 3,298
| I haven't tried it myself but a quick google search suggests that you might see some minimal gains. It's definately not going to hurt your performance. ![]()
__________________ proto My Folding Details "Friends, Family, Religion... These are the three demons you must slay in order to succeed in business" C.M. Burns |
| (Offline) | |
| | #3 |
| Forget Wakeboarding Join Date: May 2004 Location: Texas
Posts: 2,460
| Just as a note, that the CPU does not load balance between the cores. What happens is that a certain part is assigned to a core and Windows sees that core loaded so it does another on the other core. Although do this at billionths of a second and it appears to be load balancing. As for perfmance gain by setting affinity, not any that you can measure. Also the X2 has a very nice interconnect between the cores so, very little is lost there. And then once the wu is complete it restarts the core (folding) so the affinity you set is now lost.
__________________ |
| (Offline) | |
| | #4 | |
| I'd rather be sailing... Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: USA
Posts: 266
| Quote:
Cheers, Duke
__________________ Asus A8N32-SLI w/A64 4800+ 1.40 vcore; 1103 bios Zalman 7000B-ALCu HSF w/AS5 2 WD 74 GB Raptors (Raid 0) w/WindowsXP SP2 Corsair TwinX3500LLPRO 2x1gig @2.7V 2-3-2-6 1T ATI X1800XL SLI card | |
| (Offline) | |
| | #5 |
| Forget Wakeboarding Join Date: May 2004 Location: Texas
Posts: 2,460
| I tried it myself on the Server, and I found no major loss or gain from doing so. Although as a note if I am folding with just 2 clients, Windows Server 2k3 sometimes sets affinity by itself just loading 1 client per processor. So maybe Server 2k3 knows something that we don't.
__________________ |
| (Offline) | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |